Hey, actually I don't need to check for a tag value. &&
tiddler.text.contains("part Summary") is a good enough check. Thanks!!
Let me explain what I wanted to do. I have a journal with tiddlers entered
as dates. They are in the format -MM-DD so I can easily query a range
of dates (where
If all I was displaying was the tiddlerPart, then I think blank ones would
skip. But since I'm displaying tiddler.title also, then all the tiddlers
in the forEachTiddler will display. I was hoping I wouldn't have to bother
with using tags for checking but that may be the only way it will work
Doesn't it automatically get excluded?
Otherwise do this in the where part:
'tiddler.tags.contains("YourTag") && tiddler.text.contains("part
Summary)'
w
On 6 jul., 21:07, Shango wrote:
> How do I prevent tiddlers that do not have any "Summary" part from showing at
> all in the output? I just
How do I prevent tiddlers that do not have any "Summary" part from showing at
all in the output? I just need a way to test for a null value of the
partTiddler in the where clause. I'm not sure how to do that.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
@twgrp: The beauty of parts is that you can use them within the text.
For example:
Blah blah blah means whatever it means blah blah.
@Shango: yeah, it's tiddler.title, not name. I was tired when I wrote
that:D
w
On Jul 5, 3:26 pm, twgrp wrote:
> I recall recommendations *against* using parts an
I recall recommendations *against* using parts and instead use either
slices or, hm what's it called, headings?
Not quite sure why, though... ?
Examples of this are:
|Here|is a slice value|
!And here
is a heading value
You pull out the values via:
tiddlername::Here
and
[[tiddlername##And he
Oh ok. I thought since it is enclosed in quotes as a string, it would not
be confused.
I have another question. How do I prevent tiddlers that do not have any
"Summary" part from showing at all in the output? I just need a way to
test for a null value of the partTiddler in the where clause
Why can't it just be the closing ">>" ?
Because it would prematurely close the matching << on the ForEachTiddler
macro itself ! in the calling tiddler !
TonyM
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 03:46:04 UTC+10, Shango wrote:
>
> Ah Ha!!! I knew the method but I didn't know the correct syntax. The
> ">
Ah Ha!!! I knew the method but I didn't know the correct syntax. The
">\>" is what I needed. Is that a quirk of html syntax? I don't
understand the "\>" Why can't it just be the closing ">>"?
(Also, should be tiddler.title not tiddler.name).
Thanks!
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 12:09
Hi!
in the write parameter use:
'"<\>"'
w
On 4 jul., 16:54, Shango wrote:
> How can I use forEachTiddler to show specifically named parts? I want to
> display the tidder name and contents of a specifically named part of a
> tiddler if it exists. For example, if I have a part named "Summary" i
10 matches
Mail list logo
