Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Jeremy, Sorry I have not had time to respond comprehensively to these serious questions. I apologize for the length of the response but I am trying to be concise, and address a less well known approach. First, Jeremy thanks for remaining open and prepared to discuss a difference of opinion. P

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Hi Tony > > I am not saying this, perhaps moderators are necessary, I am saying to avoid > active moderation unless there is a real need. Sure spammers and trolls > should be locked out. Are you saying that this community practices active moderation without a real need? Or that you’re afraid

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Jeremy, If you’re saying that you believe that we don’t need moderators for this > group, then I respectfully disagree. Firstly, the use of moderation in > online communities is universal, and secondly we’ve always had moderators. > I am not saying this, perhaps moderators are necessary, I am s

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Ciao Jeremy & TonyM TBH I think there is a confounding factor in that GG may be a bit of a blunt instrument. The taggery issue is a case example. In one way it is good to allow anyone to *add any tag* (even for personal later access reasons) they want. BUT that would be unworkable IF moderator

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Hi Tony If you’re saying that you believe that we don’t need moderators for this group, then I respectfully disagree. Firstly, the use of moderation in online communities is universal, and secondly we’ve always had moderators. I don’t think you’re saying that moderators shouldn’t work through a

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Hi Mark > On 6 Dec 2019, at 15:14, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki > wrote: > > Ok, that's the single line, which is put at the top instead of into the > step-by-step directions: > > If you already know GitHub , note that > documentation updates must be directed to t

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Ok, that's the single line, which is put at the top instead of into the step-by-step directions: If you already know GitHub , note that > documentation updates must be directed to the tiddlywiki-com branch > I don't know what it means by "directed to the tiddlywi

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Hi Mark > On 6 Dec 2019, at 14:48, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki > wrote: > > The change to the documentation system itself was only documented with a > single line. Or maybe not even that. I don't know what it means to work on > the documentation branch. Do I make a branch below the documentation

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

The change to the documentation system itself was only documented with a single line. Or maybe not even that. I don't know what it means to work on the documentation branch. Do I make a branch below the documentation branch, or call my own branch by that name? As far as I can tell, the tiddler,

Re: [tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

A couple of thoughts: * Pinning should never have been globally available. I appreciate the argument that no great harm was done, but it evidently created confusion as to who could see that a thread had been pinned * We should agree on general rules for what threads might qualify for being pinn

[tw5] Pin Unpin Posts

Dear Mr Eric Shulman, I see you have unpin the post others pinned! While that is true to keep important thread pinned and NOT ordinary questions, but please let people decide on this! I am sorry to say that I am not happy you unpin some announcements like TiddlyTables which has got a lot of att