Initial notes and minutes are up on the wiki:
http://tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Dev:Conference_Calls/4
-- F.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to
>> Can you post a minimal test case over on [twdev]? Ideally, that's a
>> TiddlyWiki document with a plugin using a few lines of code to
>> illustrate the issue.
> [...]
> We often use a construction like this [...]
Sorry for the late response; your demo document wasn't exactly a minimal
test c
This is along the lines of what I'd like to see, but as with FND, I'd
much rather avoid the negative term "santize_unless" if possible, and
have it as "sanitize" instead. I have a hard time getting my head
around "sanitize_unless: NONE".
Also, I had in mind the sanitise algorithm would be flexibl
> Corrupting the data is pretty much exactly what we want here.
> [...]
> If somebody wants text/plain they can PUT text/plain to the server and
> it will be served back that way only.
That sounds reasonable then.
(Are text/plain PUTs stored differently? I'll look into that to make
sure I proper
