[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 3)

2020-10-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
*--- Definitely OT --- Regarding a use case using "shorthand"* PMario > > Do you have any server based setting to engage with your users? > > I would go a slightly different route. Have eg: about a miniute readable > and for the rest you have to be logged in. ... > Interesting queries!

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 3)

2020-10-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
*--- OT --- Regarding a use case using "shorthand"* TT wrote ... > Pb Ob Pbk Crl o ll at k // A1 Abk 1 L 2 R >> > PMario wrote ... > That's very interesting. So you can read this and it makes sense to you :) > I DO :-). IMO an internet that can't facilitate people who have minds already is

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 3)

2020-10-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
*Light Relief: A sillygism (a faulty syllogism with a bit of truth)* 1. Unicode aims to support ALL written characters 2. Fonts aim to support SOME written characters 3. Documents support Fonts. ∴ (therefore) ... SOME documents support SOME Unicode. -- You received this message because you

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 3)

2020-10-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao TonyM THB I don't really understand what you are asking for! The construct in Custom Markup (without a \customize pragma) for ... ´aside test *already *produces in render ... test and ´aside.my-style test produces in render test Likely I am missing your point! Best wishes TT On

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 3)

2020-10-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
TonyM wrote: > > > I simply can't get over the power this adds to tiddlywiki. > RIGHT! And Right! *But with power comes responsibility.* That is a cliche. But documenting the new approach I think we need to help PMario. Especially with examples. TonyM previously wrote: > I have returned to

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 3)

2020-10-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
*Should "Space, Space, Enter" be in Custom Markup too?* > @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> For readers on email in my last post prefaced *Regarding examples & >> WikiText "interactivity" *I deleted the last paragraph as it was >> misleading. >> TT >> > > PMario wrote: > I think it was the one

[twdev] Re: Custom markup (continued 3)

2020-10-06 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
TonyM wrote: > > > I simply can't get over the power this adds to tiddlywiki. > RIGHT! And Right! *But with power comes responsibility.* That is a cliche. But documenting the new approach I think we need to help PMario. Especially with examples. TonyM previously wrote: > I have returned to