On Fri, 29 May 2009 07:29:40 +0100
DEAN C.C. c.c.d...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
That sounds like a perfectly good description, Peter.
Pierre: would you be happy if I changed all occurrences of (Xen VNC
Proxy) in my patch to (eXtension for Virtual machine Power options)?
It's a lot more generic,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 17:00:56 +0100
Daniel P. Berrange d...@berrange.com wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
This thread seems to have died off.
Daniel, do you feel that your concerns
On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:51:48 +0200
Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
The only drawback I can think of is that some server might
not respond at all to empty update requests, even if non-
incremental, and then you'd end up not nowing if you have
one or two outstanding FBU requests and
Den 2009-05-29 16:38 skrev Pierre Ossman:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:51:48 +0200
Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
The only drawback I can think of is that some server might
not respond at all to empty update requests, even if non-
incremental, and then you'd end up not nowing if you have
On Fri, 29 May 2009 07:29:40 +0100
DEAN C.C. c.c.d...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
That sounds like a perfectly good description, Peter.
Pierre: would you be happy if I changed all occurrences of (Xen VNC
Proxy) in my patch to (eXtension for Virtual machine Power options)?
It's a lot more
