Den 2009-05-29 16:38 skrev Pierre Ossman: > On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:51:48 +0200 > Peter Rosin <p...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > >> The only drawback I can think of is that some server might >> not respond at all to empty update requests, even if non- >> incremental, and then you'd end up not nowing if you have >> one or two outstanding FBU requests and then it's not 100% >> safe to issue a change in pixfmt. >> >> Have I missed something obvious? >> > > Sounds about right. But as you point out, the behaviour of an empty FUR > is a bit unknown.
And it's of course a hell of a mess for no real gain. Loads easier to just have the server issue the requested pseudo-rect in its first update, regardless of how the request looks. What was I thinking? Cheers, Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com _______________________________________________ tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto
