Bilal,
How about using one of the spread-spectrum microprocessor clock
generator IC's?
These add a pseudo-random jitter to the clock signal so the interference
from the equipment is slightly spread causing the equipment to pass EMC
testing by causing an apparent reduction in the peak due to the
How about using one of the spread-spectrum microprocessor clock
generator IC's? These add a pseudo-random jitter to the clock signal
so the interference from the equipment is slightly spread causing the
equipment to pass EMC testing by causing an apparent reduction in the
peak due to the
Bruce,
thank you for your help! Since it is not known a priori what kind of
source will serve for the 10 MHz input I must take into account that it
is not the absolute state of art. Since the VCXO solution is not far
away from state of the art I consider it the better general choice.
I know
Hi Said,
The DDS idea that you (and Ulrich) suggest sounds like a good plan.
However, to me your predictions sound overly optimistic.
Said wrote:
But let's say these are as good as advertised, and for me that would mean
say better than -95dBc/Hz at 10Hz offset from 1GHz carrier, then by
Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
Hi Said,
The DDS idea that you (and Ulrich) suggest sounds like a good plan.
However, to me your predictions sound overly optimistic.
Said wrote:
But let's say these are as good as advertised, and for me that would mean
say better than -95dBc/Hz at
Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
Darn, the table is a mess. Here is the corrected one:
LVPECL Outputs
HzdBc/Hz
1 ?
10-127
100 -145
1k-153
10k -158
100k -158
1M-158
10MHz OCXO
HzdBc/Hz
1 -100
10-130
100 -152
1k-160
10k -165
100k
Possibly, if the ready-made spread-spectrum clocks provide enough jitter for
him. It shouldn't be hard to do it to an existing clock, though.
The article by David Chu on time-interval averaging in the June '74 HP
Journal issue talks a little about why phase modulation is preferable to FM
when
Hi folks,
a new version of EZGPIB can be downloaded from
http://www.ulrich-bangert.de/EZGPIB.zip. The new version recognizes on
startup the new switchless version of the Prologix interface and sends a
++mode 1 command to the interface in order to make it the system
controller.
Have fun with it
In a message dated 3/2/2007 03:11:25 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Phase noise of -115dBc/Hz @ 10Hz for a 100MHz carrier sounds a bit
steep when compared to one of Wenzel's ultra low noise ULN series
which achieves -125dBc/Hz @ 100Hz. (these oscillators are probably the
- Original Message -
From: Dr Bruce Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] External clock for Analog to Digital Converter in
GPS Rx front-end
Bilal Amin
Hi Robert,
I need to know the quantity of jitter I am adding to the clock signal. I
don't think so this idea will work for that ?
Bilal
- Original Message -
From: Robert Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent:
Thanks for your email.Adding noise to a sine wave is not that straight
forward I guess. Do you think a comparator works for this?
See my other comment (and the David Chu article). If my understanding is
correct, all you should need is an LC tank circuit with a varactor diode,
plus a source of
Hi John,
Thank you for your email. I am also looking at the PM method to solve my
problem. I have a HP signal generator and I can use it to generate an RF
signal and then modulate it with noise from the modulating input of the
signal generator.
I need some suggestion regarding the noise
Bilal Amin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dr Bruce Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] External clock for Analog to Digital Converter in
GPS Rx
Bilal Amin wrote:
Hi John,
Thank you for your email. I am also looking at the PM method to solve my
problem. I have a HP signal generator and I can use it to generate an RF
signal and then modulate it with noise from the modulating input of the
signal generator.
I need some suggestion
You can easily add noise to a sinewave, for example a hybrid combiner
can be used to combine the output of a sinewave generator and a noise
source.
That's just going to create AM noise, isn't it? He wants jitter (phase
modulation), I believe.
-- john, KE5FX
John Miles wrote:
You can easily add noise to a sinewave, for example a hybrid combiner
can be used to combine the output of a sinewave generator and a noise
source.
That's just going to create AM noise, isn't it? He wants jitter (phase
modulation), I believe.
-- john, KE5FX
Well, sure, but it also causes all kinds of secondary distortion effects
(such as potential clipping at the rails of whatever you're feeding the
signal into). I don't think AM'ing the signal when you want PM is a good
idea, when it's so easy to apply PM by itself.
-- john, KE5FX
John
Since
John Miles wrote:
Well, sure, but it also causes all kinds of secondary distortion effects
(such as potential clipping at the rails of whatever you're feeding the
signal into). I don't think AM'ing the signal when you want PM is a good
idea, when it's so easy to apply PM by itself.
-- john,
Well, sure, but it also causes all kinds of secondary distortion
effects (such as potential clipping at the rails of whatever you're
feeding the signal into). I don't think AM'ing the signal when you
want PM is a good idea, when it's so easy to apply PM by itself.
He's feeding a digital
I bought a nice little noise source, flat from DC to 2 GHz, a Noise/Com
model (www.noisecom.com), on eBay for $30 a year ago.
You might want to try your luck there. A noise source is very handy.
Didier KO4BB
Bilal Amin wrote:
Hi John,
Thank you for your email. I am also looking at the PM
Below is news from from Prologix.
Abdul, if you haven't met Ulrich Bangert yet, please exchange
email; he's done excellent work with your controller. Also, you're
welcome to join the time-nuts list. For details, please see:
http://www.leapsecond.com/time-nuts.htm and/or
HI All , first time request. I wish to know how I can accurately set some
oscillators on frequency. I have 3 Sulzer oscillators .. 1 x 2.5A and 2 x
2.5C's and 1 matching P/S with dead nicads.
My main reference is a Trimble Thunderbird which was the second source to
the HP unit was used in
To also support my theory the racal counters will resolve 1X10 -11
using 99 (100s) second gate time. when I activate the mean average
mode this extends the gate time two more decimal places (1 second
gate) wouldn't you assume a resultt of 2 more digits in accuracy ?
Things are
HI All , first time request. I wish to know how I can accurately set some
oscillators on frequency. I have 3 Sulzer oscillators .. 1 x 2.5A and 2 x
2.5C's and 1 matching P/S with dead nicads.
My main reference is a Trimble Thunderbird which was the second source to
the HP unit was used
HI Tom, I realised when I read your reply that I had not said how I was
observing the result. I am feeding these signals into a 100 MHZ CRO not a
counter and visually observing the 2 signals in relationship to each other.
1 being the Trimble which I believe to be good to 3 parts in10^12 and the
Yep, that's great as long as the comparator's already there or can be easily
added. I was mainly wrinkling my nose at the idea of adding hybrid
combiners and the like, just to introduce some jitter.
-- john, KE5FX
Well, sure, but it also causes all kinds of secondary distortion
effects
Don,
Yes, using an oscilloscope in this way is a time-honored
trick to observe slow changes in relative phase over time.
It gets even better if you have access to a storage 'scope
or variable persistence because then you can get a rough
sense of short-term jitter as well.
Either way, the math
Hi John and Bruce,
Thank you for your ideas. Now I have a much better picture for the
experiment using the comparator. Now, my only concern is a noise generator.
I have searched and found out that all the commercially available now
generators are very expensive and some what out of my price
Bilal Amin wrote:
Hi John and Bruce,
Thank you for your ideas. Now I have a much better picture for the
experiment using the comparator. Now, my only concern is a noise generator.
I have searched and found out that all the commercially available now
generators are very expensive and some
Bilal Amin wrote:
Hi John and Bruce,
Thank you for your ideas. Now I have a much better picture for the
experiment using the comparator. Now, my only concern is a noise generator.
I have searched and found out that all the commercially available now
generators are very expensive and some
31 matches
Mail list logo