From: James Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [time-nuts] 15 ns vs. 15 nS
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:26:13 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Didier Juges wrote:
Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma.
Didier KO4BB
A long s we are being pedantic:
15 ns = 15 nanoseconds,
I could not figure if the Resolution-T (or Mini-T) provides carrier phase
data.
I would guess not. The manual with TSIP commands is at:
http://www.trimble.com/tmg_resolutiont_ts.asp
Looks like it reports code phase in units of 1/16 chip.
What were your plans if it had carrier phase?
I do
If I recall correctly, unit names based on proper names get an upper
case (like Siemens, Joules, Curie and others), others don't get any
respect (gram, calorie, meter and such)
So it would be correct that nS would be nano Siemens and ns would be
nano second.
Having been on the western side of
At 10:30 AM 5/22/2007, you wrote:
John Day wrote:
At 09:26 AM 5/22/2007, Didier Juges wrote:
Having been on the western side of the pond for too long (people here
could not care less about SI units, they drive on parkways and park on
driveways anyhow), I got bad habits, sorry...
As Seconds are a fundamental unit of the SI system, shouldn't the S be
upper case?
SI units named after famous dead guys are capitalized (cf Farad (F),
Hertz (Hz), etc). SI units that are something else aren't (cf meter
(m), liter (l) and gram (g)).
Warner
At 10:13 AM 5/22/2007, you wrote:
In Imperial measure, 8 pints make a gallon and 2 pints make a quart.
US quarts???...
Two Imperial pints makes an Imperial Quart, as it does in US Customary measure.
:-)
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warner Losh writes:
As Seconds are a fundamental unit of the SI system, shouldn't the S be
upper case?
SI units named after famous dead guys are capitalized (cf Farad (F),
Hertz (Hz), etc). SI units that are something else aren't (cf meter
(m), liter (l) and gram
John Day wrote:
Funniest thing is I have a very good friend, a librarian in Paris,
who comes to Canada regularly. He prefers to converse in English with
Francophone Canadians because he says it is easier to understand than
the 18th century, rural France, based accent of the French spoken
Thought some of you fellow 'nuts might be interested in this:
http://www.quartzlock.com/resources/DSQL2006.pdf
There's a new-for-2007 economy line of 1U standards and related gear.
The A8-MX GPS(carrier phase)DO built-around the QUARTZLOCK BVA looks mighty
sweet - they are claiming
At 02:55 PM 5/22/2007, Chuck Harris wrote...
Rob Kimberley wrote:
In Imperial measure, 8 pints make a gallon and 2 pints make a
quart.
US quarts???...
US quart is 32 oz, and 4 of them makes a US gallon. 5 makes an
imperial gallon.
No, because US and Imperial ounces are not the
At 03:15 PM 5/22/2007, you wrote:
At 02:55 PM 5/22/2007, Chuck Harris wrote...
Rob Kimberley wrote:
In Imperial measure, 8 pints make a gallon and 2 pints make a
quart.
US quarts???...
US quart is 32 oz, and 4 of them makes a US gallon. 5 makes an
imperial gallon.
No, because
Nice literature.
I never came across any of their units in the field.
Rob K
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Christopher Hoover
Sent: 22 May 2007 19:50
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] QUARTZLOCK product guide
Thought
In a message dated 5/22/2007 14:47:15 Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice literature.
I never came across any of their units in the field.
Rob K
I have one of their Rb's. Very nice performance.
bye,
Said
** See what's free
13 matches
Mail list logo
