Re: [time-nuts] Fury Realhamradio listing

2007-08-20 Thread SAIDJACK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY In a message dated 8/20/2007 02:26:09 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A side effect of the 5 sample average is the opportunity to reduce the effective saw tooth error to 1/5 when the GPS LO is adjusted

Re: [time-nuts] Fury Realhamradio listing

2007-08-20 Thread Tom Van Baak
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY We do see differences in our Fury GPSDO when it is running using an M12+ versus an M12M (all else being the same), the M12M receivers seem to have significantly less diurnal pertrubations than the M12+ (well, we are

Re: [time-nuts] Fury Realhamradio listing

2007-08-20 Thread SAIDJACK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY In a message dated 8/20/2007 12:47:02 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I could be wrong, but diurnal perturbations sound like antenna, location, or placement more than receiver. 12h or 24h period? Hi