); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Greetings all. I have a Datum 9390-6000 with the Rubidium frequency standard
inside that has been working fine for the past year or so. It requires a
high gain antenna and I'm using a Symmetricom 58532A L1 antenna. With this
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Mitch -
I have about 6 of the 9390 series receivers. Most with Rubidiums and some
with OCXOs. I had 3 of them running simultaneously with a Z3801A. They were
on an HP antenna running through a 4 way splitter that is widely
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi Mitch:
It turns out that the Trimble first generation GPS receivers require a high
gain antenna or an amplifier in the feed line to work properly. So one of the
antennas that works for them may be what's needed for your
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi:
NIST has come up with a new magnetic sensor that's in the 3 to 40 fT range.
It's based on a Rb cell's sensivity to magnetic fields. It's based on the work
done for the Chip-Scale Atomic Clock. See:
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi Mitch,
What cable are you using? Units used to ship (when I was selling them ) with
the Trimble Bullet II antenna. If your cable is dropping more than 30-35 dB
at 1575MHz then you will have problems. You might want to check
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
NIST is making it small, which is new, but the technology is
well-established. See, for example:
http://www.geometrics.com/magnetometers/magnetometers.html
-RL
---
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
I have been a strong advocate for the 53131/2 counter since I first
encountered in in 1993. Most of my applications are for a time-interval
counter (TIC) measuring the time interval between an atomic clock and
GPS
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
There was an interesting homebrew proton-precession magnetometer in Circuit
Cellar magazine a few months back. Not very exotic compared to Cs and Rb
tech, but somewhat more accessible to experimenters. You fill two 16-ounce
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From Your Humble SysAdmin:
I just received a bad-boy message from AOL relating to the Mini
Magnetic Sensor email that was posted to the list this afternoon.
These messages usually result from an AOL subscriber hitting the
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 10/11/2007 23:04:14 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I just received a bad-boy message from AOL relating to the Mini
Magnetic Sensor email that was posted to the list this afternoon.
These
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 11/10/2007 06:25 PM:
I lost access to my Teknet manual download account a while back, the
explanation being that AOL had blocked them from sending to any AOL user.
When they
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Curious... did it cost you anything to sign up for this white list?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 5:35 PM
To:
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
No, just some emails back and forth to prove I was a good guy...
John
Jack Hudler said the following on 11/10/2007 08:43 PM:
Curious... did it cost you anything to sign up for this white list?
-Original
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi Tom,
Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
I have been a strong advocate for the 53131/2 counter since I first
encountered in in 1993. Most of my applications are for a time-interval
counter (TIC) measuring the time interval
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Bernd T-Online wrote:
Hi Tom,
Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
I have been a strong advocate for the 53131/2 counter since I first
encountered in in 1993. Most of my applications are for a time-interval
counter (TIC)
15 matches
Mail list logo