Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Magnus Danie lson writes: >From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver >Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:38:41 + >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Magnus Da

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carl Walker writes: >On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:02 +0200, Magnus Danielson wrote: >There's more than meets the eye initially when you attempt a receiver >design of this type - at least as far as the analog section goes. I hate to say so, but actual experience proces

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carl Walker writes: > >> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:02 +0200, Magnus Danielson wrote: >> > > >> There's more than meets the eye initially when you attempt a receiver >> design of this type - at least as far as the analog section go

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Griffiths writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >You've misunderstood the problem. No, you have, and you are barking up a different tree than I'm climbing. Look at the subject, it says "... frequency receiver". >If one wishes to decode the AM time code broadcas

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Griffiths writes: > >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > > >> You've misunderstood the problem. >> > > No, you have, and you are barking up a different tree than I'm climbing. > > Look at the subject, it says "... frequenc

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Griffiths writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Look at the subject, it says "... frequency receiver". >> >The meaning diverged/became ambiguous after Magnus made his post. >My comments apply to the extended capability receiver that Magnus >envisaged and no

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Elio Corbolante
You can try to ask to IV3NWV (Nico Palermo), the One who developed Perseus: maybe he can say something about the feasibility of such "broadband" receiver ... Elio. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.c

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Jeroen Bastemeijer
Dear Time-Nuts, I have been reading the discussion about what is possible and impossible with the ARM evaluation board. The proposed idea(s) to build a versatile receiver which could be used for receiving various time/frequency reference transmitter around the world sounds great! It is my beli

[time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Jim Lux
For your amusement... Sitting in a waiting room yesterday, I read an article in a very-high-end audio magazine describing a $15K Rubidium frequency standard for providing low jitter clocks to your audio system. It has outputs at 44.1, 48, etc. kHz, as well as a 100kHz, which the person wr

[time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread David Stelpstra
Hi, The announcement of a leapsecond end of this year just came in. See: ftp://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.dat Regards David This e-mail message contains information which is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for use by the addressee only. If you ar

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Chuck Harris
Two leap seconds in as many years! It must be that global warming. -Chuck Harris David Stelpstra wrote: > Hi, > > > > The announcement of a leapsecond end of this year just came in. > > See: ftp://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.dat > > > > Regards > > David _

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread GandalfG8
In a message dated 04/07/2008 14:51:19 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sitting in a waiting room yesterday, I read an article in a very-high-end audio magazine describing a $15K Rubidium frequency standard for providing low jitter clocks to your audio system. It has out

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Robert Lutwak
http://www.antelopeaudio.com/en/products_iso_10m.html At 09:49 AM 7/4/2008, you wrote: >For your amusement... > >Sitting in a waiting room yesterday, I read an article in a >very-high-end audio magazine describing a $15K Rubidium frequency >standard for providing low jitter clocks to your audio s

[time-nuts] Tektronix TDS Communication Modules

2008-07-04 Thread NE8S
Greetings, all, I need any of the compatible Communication Modules for the TDS 2024 DSO. Specifically, the TDS2CMA, TDS2CMAX, TDS2MEM or any of these variants. Please check with all of your colleagues, associates, and constituents for me if you would be so kind. Thank you in advance for any he

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Jim Lux
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Fri 04 Jul 2008 08:01:04 AM PDT: > > In a message dated 04/07/2008 14:51:19 GMT Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Sitting in a waiting room yesterday, I read an article in a > very-high-end audio magazine describing a $15K Rubidium frequency > standard

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread David Forbes
At 6:49 AM -0700 7/4/08, Jim Lux wrote: >For your amusement... > >Sitting in a waiting room yesterday, I read an article in a >very-high-end audio magazine describing a $15K Rubidium frequency >standard for providing low jitter clocks to your audio system. It has >outputs at 44.1, 48, etc. kHz, as

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Christian Vogel
> ESOTERIC - G-0Rb MASTER CLOCK GENERATOR (RUBIDIUM) …“esoteric”… While I realize the absurdity of hooking up such a thing to your CD player at home, there can be merits of having a centrally generated and extremely accurate clock in a professional audio/video production facility. When you are pas

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: Christian Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles? Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:59:51 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ESOTERIC - G-0Rb MASTER CLOCK GENERATOR (RUBIDIUM) > …“esoteric”… > > While I realize the absurdity of hooking up such a thing

[time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Mark Sims
Try putting the output of a CD or FM radio signal into a FFT based waterfall display. An amazing number of songs, etc have very prominent 15734KHz and/or 15.625KHz harmonics that are obviously from CRT monitors in the recording booth. Recording engineers ain't what they used to be... You can

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Bill Hawkins
Chuck Harris wrote, "Two leap seconds in as many years! It must be that global warming." Well, yes. The Earth expands from the heat, rotation slows, and we get another leap second - as we watch symptom after symptom occur while being unable to come to consensus on what to do. Bill Hawkins __

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Bill Hawkins
Jim Lux said, in part, "Hey... here's a golden opportunity for a time nut. I suspect they generate the various clocks using (gasp) digital dividers and such. Now's your chance to design an incredibly complex all analog synthesis chain with step recovery diodes, mix and add, etc. Everyone

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Scott Newell
At 11:59 AM 7/4/2008, Christian Vogel wrote: > > ESOTERIC - G-0Rb MASTER CLOCK GENERATOR (RUBIDIUM) >…“esoteric”… >¦ > >While I realize the absurdity of hooking up such a thing to your >CD player at home, there can be merits of having a centrally generated >and extremely accurate clock in a pro

[time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Ronald Held
I just got that bulletin. I will have to adjust all of the programs using the update data from the Astronautic Almanac when the next one is issued. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailm

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency

2008-07-04 Thread Ed, k1ggi
If there is something smaller than a nit to pick in the grand scheme of things, this may be it. Anyway - these days WWVB is running the depth at 17dB. Interesting info at http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/2139.pdf Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Greg Burnett
---Jim wrote: ...they had the special speaker cables with the arrows to indicate preferred direction of power flow, too) ---clip--- Jim, "directional" audio interconnect cables typically have two conductors for the signal path, plus a shield. The shield is connected at only the "destination"

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Chuck Harris
Bill Hawkins wrote: > Jim Lux said, in part, > > "Hey... here's a golden opportunity for a time nut. I suspect they > generate the various clocks using (gasp) digital dividers and such. > Now's your chance to design an incredibly complex all analog synthesis > chain with step recovery diod

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Chuck Harris
Bill Hawkins wrote: > Chuck Harris wrote, > > "Two leap seconds in as many years! > > It must be that global warming." > > > Well, yes. The Earth expands from the heat, rotation slows, > and we get another leap second - as we watch symptom after > symptom occur while being unable to come to con

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Ronald Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I just got that bulletin. I will have to adjust all of the programs : using the update data from the Astronautic Almanac when the next one : is issued. Yes, this is one of the problems with leap seconds. Opin

[time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Mark Sims
No, no, no... you must use dekatrons for your dividers. Solves many audiophile requirements at one time... vacuum tube, nifty spinning glowing thingies you can watch though cutout windows, endless entertainment for dope addled brains, err uhhh I forget the rest. > Jim Lux said, in part,

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Didier Juges
No, I think it's just a vast conspiracy :-) Didier KO4BB > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Harris > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 9:14 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New l

Re: [time-nuts] Tektronix TDS Communication Modules

2008-07-04 Thread Didier Juges
These are still available from Tektronix, even though last time I checked, you can buy a working Tek 2430 storage scope on eBay for less. I have one in my TDS-210, but I would not give it up for anything (oh well, almost anything...) Didier KO4BB > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Alan Melia
On the 4th July it (the Sun) was actually at its furtherst point from earth so we were getting less radiation .did your burghers take longer to cook ?? :-)) Alan G3NYK - Original Message - From: "Chuck Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurem

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Tom Clark, K3IO
Chuck Harris commented Two leap seconds in as many years! It must be that global warming. -Chuck Harris UT1 is the time measured with respect to the stars, while UTC and TAI are based on the rate of laboratory atomic clocks; I like to say that UT1 is the time you would

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Javier Herrero
What about a chain of E1T tubes? A lot nicer! ;) And... why mess with noisy Rb references? A true audiophile has a H-maser, of course ;) Mark Sims escribió: > No, no, no... you must use dekatrons for your dividers. Solves many > audiophile requirements at one time... vacuum tube, nifty spin

[time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Mark Sims
Bahhh, a TRUE audiophile has three H-masers. You just can't trust your favorite recording of Thick as a Brick to a single reference clock. You need a realtime thee-cornered hat voter/selector to chose the best one. But masers do meet the number one audiophile requirement of a having a glowi

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Thomas A. Frank
On Jul 3, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Carl Walker wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:02 +0200, Magnus Danielson wrote: >>> The analog side would need to allow for those signals also then. >> >> Naturally. The antenna-amplifier design will need to be more wideband >> oriented. Should not be too hard thought.

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bill Hawkins" writes: >Well, yes. The Earth expands from the heat, rotation slows, [...] You're right, but from my back of the envelope calculation, it's negligble. Most of the expected expansion is the water in the oceans, which expand roughly 10^-4 per Kelvin i

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Thomas A. Frank" wr ites: >In as much as we know exactly the frequencies of interest, perhaps >the analog front end could consist of multiple signal paths with very >narrow band filters to separate out the signals of interest (a 60 kHz >channel, a 100 kHz cha

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Jim Lux
Quoting Mark Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri 04 Jul 2008 04:02:49 PM PDT: > > Bahhh, a TRUE audiophile has three H-masers. You just can't trust > your favorite recording of Thick as a Brick to a single reference > clock. You need a realtime thee-cornered hat voter/selector to > chose

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Jim Lux
Quoting Greg Burnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri 04 Jul 2008 11:54:35 AM PDT: > ---Jim wrote: > ...they had the special speaker cables with the arrows to indicate > preferred direction of power flow, too) > ---clip--- > > Jim, "directional" audio interconnect cables typically have two conducto

[time-nuts] HP 113BR manual scanned

2008-07-04 Thread David Forbes
Another one from the old 36 foot NRAO telescope files - the HP 113BR analog clock unit. http://www.nixiebunny.com/hp113br.pdf Enjoy. Does anyone think Agilent is interested in a manual for something this old, or is this more of an HP Archives sort of boatanchor? I also have a 103AR manual to s

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Jim Lux wrote: > > That one I'm familiar with.. (SpaceWire cables, for instance, have 4 > shielded twisted pairs, 2 in each direction, with the shields grounded > at the sending end for each pair of pairs)... > > > These were just plain old two (gold/palladium plated) pins for each > "cable"

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Jim Lux
Quoting Bruce Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri 04 Jul 2008 05:47:53 PM PDT: > Jim Lux wrote: >> >> That one I'm familiar with.. (SpaceWire cables, for instance, have 4 >> shielded twisted pairs, 2 in each direction, with the shields grounded >> at the sending end for each pair of pairs)...

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Thomas A. Frank" wr > ites: > > >> In as much as we know exactly the frequencies of interest, perhaps >> the analog front end could consist of multiple signal paths with very >> narrow band filters to separate out the signals of int

Re: [time-nuts] Rb references for audiophiles?

2008-07-04 Thread Mike Feher
Talking about magnets and skin depth, I recall an incident back in the early to mid 60's. I was living on Long Island at the time and had many friends who worked at Brookhaven National Laboratory. Needless to say I had numerous tours of the facility. At one time I was given a tour of the cryogenic

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Bob Paddock
On Friday 04 July 2008 03:07:47 pm Chuck Harris wrote: > > Well, yes. The Earth expands from the heat, rotation slows, > > and we get another leap second - as we watch symptom after > > symptom occur while being unable to come to consensus on > > what to do. > > I say that we take up the issue wit

Re: [time-nuts] New leap second

2008-07-04 Thread Hal Murray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >In case anyone is interested, here is the actual UT1-UTC data > produced by the group I headed for many years (until I > retired in 2001): Nice graphs. Thanks. What is cusaing the bumps? Why are they now big enough to see easily but much smaller a while ago. Th

Re: [time-nuts] HP 113BR manual scanned

2008-07-04 Thread Greg Burnett
David, I forwarded your announcement to the same Agilent friend (who works at the Agilent U.S. Technical Call Center and who handled your 105A/B manual contribution). ...And I asked if Agilent is interested in manuals for the very old, rare items like the 113BR. I'll also ask if Agilent has an

Re: [time-nuts] Near-perfect chip for Loran-C frequency receiver

2008-07-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Griffiths writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Look at: >> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/L6/ >> >Nonsense, although it may work in favourable cases where the signal >levels arent too disparate, in the more general case this isnt true. Bruce, you are inp