Re: [time-nuts] Of possible interest

2012-12-10 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 12/10/2012 02:53 PM, Jim Lux wrote: On 12/9/12 10:14 PM, DaveH wrote: http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/325731,researchers-find-crippling-flaws-in -global-gps.aspx ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.f

[time-nuts] 5061A Beam Current question

2012-12-10 Thread Pete Lancashire
I've got a couple questions on a early S/N 5061A I got a few days ago. It took a couple days but the Ion Pump current is now down to "zero" or at least less then one division on the meter. I'm able to get the unit to go into continuous operation mode by following the TURN-ON PROCEDURES but have a

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread WB6BNQ
Hi Charles, Well, perhaps you are not looking close enough. That is you need to be observing at a finer level of comparison. The changes, observed here and at another location, are in parts in 10-10 to 10-11 range, sometimes larger. At one of the locations there was a direct correlation to the

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz
That temperature sensor does have an effect on the final outcome as it is part of the internal equation. So buffering the ambient temperature is important. I've heard this before, but the evidence I have seen does not seem to support the proposition. While switching the Dallas chip in one

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Stan, W1LE
Hello S.W., On occasion I get an "ALARM 4000" with Lady Heather V3.10, However I know not what it means. The alarm is transient. Over the past weeks it only occurred twice. I just checked my T'Bolts and 2 of them displayed a partial PPS Adev (upper) table but a full OSC Adev table (lower). I

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature (Sarah White)

2012-12-10 Thread johncroos
Sarah - As others will point out the temperature reported by the T-bolt is NOT the oven temperature. Rather it is the temperature of a temp sensing chip on the PWB. There were several versions of this chip installed and they did not all work the same - on the time nuts archive there is a weal

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread David
If it *was* missing codes in reality, it would not be the first time TI made that kind of mistake. One of their not so early multi-slope integrating converters was advertised to *not* return both plus zero and minus zero which was a big feature at the time . . . but it did. Almost nobody noticed t

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi It's not at all uncommon for the seismic guys to go a bit uber-nuts on clean supplies and references. Bob On Dec 10, 2012, at 7:54 PM, David wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:01:49 +, "Poul-Henning Kamp" > wrote: > >> In message , David writes: >> >>> The gain drift is specified at 2p

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread David
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:01:49 +, "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote: >In message , David writes: > >>The gain drift is specified at 2ppm per degree C. There are >>provisions for a calibration cycle but that requires external >>multiplexing. > >That's the really smart thing about this particular chip:

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread WB6BNQ
Sarah, That temperature sensor does have an effect on the final outcome as it is part of the internal equation. So buffering the ambient temperature is important. You do not need to go crazy, but having it contained in a box with some small amount of heat applied and maintained by some control

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Sarah White
On 12/10/2012 6:10 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: > I believe that the high temperature alarm you see is triggered at 50 degrees > C. If that is what you're seeing without artificially raising the > temperature > of the Thunderbolt by insulating it so it can't radiate the heat, what I said > about rep

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Arthur Dent
I believe that the high temperature alarm you see is triggered at 50 degrees C.  If that is what you're seeing without artificially raising the temperature of the Thunderbolt by insulating it so it can't radiate the heat, what I said about replacing the chip is correct but if it is staying withi

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Didier Juges writes: >I do not understand how anyone can guaranty no missing codes when the lower >11 bits are essentially noise? (31 bits resolution versus 20 effective bits) No missing codes is guaranteed by the design, you'd have to screw up the digital filters to come o

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Sarah White
On 12/10/2012 5:22 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > The oven in the OCXO keeps the crystal at a constant temperature. It is > normal for the TBolt it's self to idle 10 to 20C above ambient. The > temperature sensor is located near the 9 pin D connector. It shows a > temperature somewhere in between

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , David writes: >The gain drift is specified at 2ppm per degree C. There are >provisions for a calibration cycle but that requires external >multiplexing. That's the really smart thing about this particular chip: You can drive the geophone calibration signal in through the s

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Arthur Dent
>I feel like shouldn't need to fuss with ambient conditions this heavily >for an OCXO, and find myself researching construction / design for a DIY >outer-oven to wrap the thunderbolt in. > >Anyone have experience with non-stable temperature on a trimble thunderbolt?" The temperature you see is not

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Didier Juges
I agree, but there is a difference between something that you should be able to achieve by design and being able to prove it, or even if it's useful in practice. In a case like this, the wide span between resolution and effective bits makes me wonder what's the point of advertising the former other

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread George Dubovsky
Sarah, The reported temperature is not the oven temp, but rather the temp of the circuit board just behind the DB-9 serial connector. As far as I know, the actual oven temp is not available outside the OCXO. Regards, geo On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Sarah White wrote: > Ended up with a ge

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Miller
Hi Sarah, The temperature you are seeing is that of a Dallas IC mounted on the main PC board. You are seeing the ambient temp of the board, not inside the OCXO oven. Regards, Tom - Original Message - From: "Sarah White" To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The oven in the OCXO keeps the crystal at a constant temperature. It is normal for the TBolt it's self to idle 10 to 20C above ambient. The temperature sensor is located near the 9 pin D connector. It shows a temperature somewhere in between the ambient and the OCXO case temperature. Some ha

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt oven / non-stable operating temperature

2012-12-10 Thread Sarah White
Ended up with a gently used trimble thunderbolt a few months ago, and been trying to figure out the best settings to use (time constant, damping, etc.) for best performance. I got distracted though. There is something which I find rather annoying, and I'm spending more time messing with this facto

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread David
The gain drift is specified at 2ppm per degree C. There are provisions for a calibration cycle but that requires external multiplexing. On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:26:55 -0800 (PST), Robert LaJeunesse wrote: >. . . > >typical for better monolithic sigma-delta converters. Nonetheless 20 bits >indica

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread David
Integrating converters including delta-sigma converters can be no missing codes by design without being able to take advantage of the full resolution that implies. Integral nonlinearity, drift, and noise will limit the usable resolution. On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:08:38 -0600, Didier Juges wrote: >

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I suspect you can prove it mathematically. You could also just sit there and watch what it puts out for a year or so. With a reasonable ramp it likely would put out all codes. That's not to say you could prove they are in order, only that you saw all 4 billion codes. More or less: 1,000 sam

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread lists
Regarding feedback loops, I had a brain fart. I mean monotonic and no missing codes, not no missing codes in general. I think it was Fluke or Analog that had a small booklet on understanding data converter specifications. ___ time-nuts mailing li

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Didier Juges
How long does it take to prove it? And what's the point? On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Gerhard Hoffmann wrote: > Am 10.12.2012 21:53, schrieb Didier Juges: > > I do not understand how anyone can guaranty no missing codes when the >> lower >> 11 bits are essentially noise? (31 bits resolutio

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Gerhard Hoffmann
Am 10.12.2012 21:53, schrieb Didier Juges: I do not understand how anyone can guaranty no missing codes when the lower 11 bits are essentially noise? (31 bits resolution versus 20 effective bits) With that much noise it is really guaranteed that no code will be missing. :-) Gerhard _

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Didier Juges
I do not understand how anyone can guaranty no missing codes when the lower 11 bits are essentially noise? (31 bits resolution versus 20 effective bits) On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:19 PM, wrote: > It is 31 bits with no missing codes. Usually missing codes is of concern > in feedback systems, but

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread lists
It is 31 bits with no missing codes. Usually missing codes is of concern in feedback systems, but I don't see the use in a geophone. Perhaps they will average the digital signal further to reduce the noise, hence the noisy bits. ___ time-nuts mailing

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi When your "sound source" is a thumper truck, you do indeed care about some pretty low frequencies. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Hal Murray Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:33 PM To: Discussion of precise time

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Hal Murray
rlajeune...@sbcglobal.net said: > Nonetheless 20 bits indicates a matching reference would have to hold 1PPM > over temperature, no simple task. The initial post called it "TI's ADS1282 geophone ADC". I'm pretty sure that the geologists using geophones don't care about super low frequencies s

Re: [time-nuts] Counter

2012-12-10 Thread Didier Juges
Well, that obviously went to the wrong place. That was a private message, sorry for the bandwidth. Didier On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:06 PM, dlewis6767 wrote: > Thanks, Didier, if you ever find a mainframe for it, please keep me in > mind. > > Thanks, -Don > > > > > -

Re: [time-nuts] Counter

2012-12-10 Thread dlewis6767
Thanks, Didier, if you ever find a mainframe for it, please keep me in mind. Thanks, -Don -- From: Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:23 AM To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" Subject: [time-nuts] Counter I

[time-nuts] Counter

2012-12-10 Thread shalimr9
Is shipped, tracking number 1Z30VR960337713831 due Wednesday Didier Sent from my Droid Razr 4G LTE wireless tracker. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and fol

Re: [time-nuts] Switching oscillators

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The oven monitor pin on most OCXO's is not a real good thing to switch directly off of. They generally go low well before the output is very stable. A timer is run off of the oven monitor pin would give you a pretty good switch point (switch X minutes after the oven monitor shows good). Bob -

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi What is atypical about these parts is: 1) The excellent noise performance inside 10 Hz 2) The built in Nyquist filters The first is very impressive compared to just about anything else out there. The second is available in some, but not all similar parts. Bob -Original Message- From

Re: [time-nuts] EIP545A 18GHz counter query

2012-12-10 Thread J. Forster
Yes. There is a Yahoo Group spwecifically about EIP products. -John > > >> I have an EIP counter with a problem, stashed, that I need to look at >> eventually. So have been following the thread a bit. > >> If you guys get somewhere conclusive (or not), might be nice to post a

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Azelio Boriani
I see that there is a high resolution 130dB mode too that can give 21 bits @ 250 samples per second, good for very slow, high resolution DMTD (but also very stable voltage reference and ADC temperature, seems very challenging). On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Robert LaJeunesse < rlajeune...@sbcgl

Re: [time-nuts] Strange DCF77 master clock data

2012-12-10 Thread mike cook
Le 10/12/2012 13:44, Chris Howard a écrit : If it were me, I'd suspect that my window of bits is off to the left or right by one bit. The old "first bit is called zero" problem. And the relationship between 7-> 3 and 5-> 1 makes me wonder. Chris On 12/10/2012 5:00 AM, Tom Harris wrote: I

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Robert LaJeunesse
31 bits is just a convenient word size that comes out of the on-chip filter, and does not really relate to performance. Better to look at SNR which, at worst case, is 120dB in high-res mode. That indicates performance just under 20 bits, typical for better monolithic sigma-delta converters. Non

Re: [time-nuts] EIP545A 18GHz counter query

2012-12-10 Thread J. L. Trantham
I'm already over there. The thread just migrated back here. Joe -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:43 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-n

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Azelio Boriani writes: >31-bit is 186dB... with what do you compare that device? What kind of >reference is needed? It's not 31 noise-free bits, but the SNR is in the 120-130dB territory. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org |

Re: [time-nuts] EIP545A 18GHz counter query

2012-12-10 Thread Steve
Or join and post to the EIP_Microwave Yahoo group - lots of good info showing up there! Steve WB0DBS On Dec 10, 2012, at 8:00 AM, "J. L. Trantham" wrote: > Me too. > > I have two 545A's, one of which works and the other of which has issues with > Band 3, failing to read in a very interest

Re: [time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

2012-12-10 Thread Azelio Boriani
31-bit is 186dB... with what do you compare that device? What kind of reference is needed? On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > It's the "big brother" of the ADS127x parts that I mentioned a little > while back. I'm sure it works quite well. The 127x's are fine parts. The >

Re: [time-nuts] EIP545A 18GHz counter query

2012-12-10 Thread paul swed
Chris and I took this offline so as not to bother the time-nuts thread. Hopefully we can work it through. Chris is lucky as he only has a band 2 problem. Band 3 in nastier o deal with. Chris since several have expressed interest perhaps we just add them to your new thread. We can still skype for th

Re: [time-nuts] EIP545A 18GHz counter query

2012-12-10 Thread J. L. Trantham
Me too. I have two 545A's, one of which works and the other of which has issues with Band 3, failing to read in a very interesting pattern suggesting a YIG filter issue, probably the control circuit. Just no time to chase it right now. Please post the resolution. Thanks. Joe -Original Me

Re: [time-nuts] Of possible interest

2012-12-10 Thread Jim Lux
On 12/9/12 10:14 PM, DaveH wrote: http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/325731,researchers-find-crippling-flaws-in -global-gps.aspx ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nut

Re: [time-nuts] Of possible interest

2012-12-10 Thread Jim Lux
On 12/9/12 10:14 PM, DaveH wrote: http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/325731,researchers-find-crippling-flaws-in -global-gps.aspx ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nut

Re: [time-nuts] EIP545A 18GHz counter query

2012-12-10 Thread Chris Wilson
> I have an EIP counter with a problem, stashed, that I need to look at > eventually. So have been following the thread a bit. > If you guys get somewhere conclusive (or not), might be nice to post a > summary of all important details, techniques, or circuit notes beyond > the manual, found, t

Re: [time-nuts] Sir Patrick Moore

2012-12-10 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
On 12/10/2012 7:10 AM, David Kirkby wrote: On 10 December 2012 09:24, David C. Partridge wrote: Related to time-nuttery as astonomical observation was used for time-keeping until C20. Sir Patrick Moore, the great amateur astonomer died yesterday at the age of 89. Although considered an amat

Re: [time-nuts] Switching oscillators

2012-12-10 Thread J. L. Trantham
Not sure why you would want to do this but, if you have a Rb, such as an LPRO-101 or others, there is a signal that lets you know the Rb is 'locked'. You could use that to drive a relay that would switch the output of the Rb to the external input of your device. This presumes you do not have to me

Re: [time-nuts] EIP545A 18GHz counter query

2012-12-10 Thread Rex
I have an EIP counter with a problem, stashed, that I need to look at eventually. So have been following the thread a bit. If you guys get somewhere conclusive (or not), might be nice to post a summary of all important details, techniques, or circuit notes beyond the manual, found, to this thr

Re: [time-nuts] Strange DCF77 master clock data

2012-12-10 Thread Chris Howard
If it were me, I'd suspect that my window of bits is off to the left or right by one bit. The old "first bit is called zero" problem. And the relationship between 7-> 3 and 5-> 1 makes me wonder. Chris On 12/10/2012 5:00 AM, Tom Harris wrote: > I am logging the data from this strange master

Re: [time-nuts] Nifty "MINI TIC" for DMTD work please hold off, 4 channel pic...

2012-12-10 Thread Rex
Bert, I have been waiting for more details to become available. Thanks for the update. Not sure exactly what this means: but I have to depend on volunteers to do the drawings and they have to make their time available when convenient. Depending on if the input is in some kind of standard, or

Re: [time-nuts] Sir Patrick Moore

2012-12-10 Thread David Kirkby
On 10 December 2012 09:24, David C. Partridge wrote: > Related to time-nuttery as astonomical observation was used for time-keeping > until C20. > > Sir Patrick Moore, the great amateur astonomer died yesterday at the age of > 89. Although considered an amateur, I assume he got paid for present

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A OSMT connector / RS232

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi You may have a TTL output level version of the FE. Bob On Dec 10, 2012, at 1:24 AM, James Peroulas wrote: > For the record, my device did have an OSMT (not Hirose) connector on the > DDS board. > > I'm having trouble getting the internal RS232 port on the DDS board to work > and I was wond

Re: [time-nuts] Cinox source

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Perkin Elmer does everything that EG&G used to do - same company, new name. Bob On Dec 9, 2012, at 11:07 PM, Jim Lux wrote: > On 12/9/12 5:38 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> HI >> >> Princeton was part of EG&G for quite a while. EG&G bought out Perkin Elmer >> in the 90's. The EG&G name was not a

Re: [time-nuts] Switching oscillators

2012-12-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi On Dec 9, 2012, at 9:07 PM, WB6BNQ wrote: > Bob, > > I don't know where you got your multiple versions. Quite possibly from having spent the last 40 years in the business of designing and building OCXO's. > RETRACE deals with the object in a fully realized steady state operating > cond

Re: [time-nuts] Strange DCF77 master clock data

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Harris
That's the funny thing, the parity bit is correct for the value of DOW, just that the DOW value is wrong. On 9 December 2012 23:27, Azelio Boriani wrote: > Is the parity bit P3 consistent? It protects the day of the month and that > of the week. > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:24 PM, mike cook wro

Re: [time-nuts] Strange DCF77 master clock data

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Harris
I am logging the data from this strange master clock, and the none of the bits 42 through 44 are stuck. Good idea, though. I have just checked tonight, and the DOW is indicating as 5 (Friday), despite it only being Monday. Good idea though. On 9 December 2012 23:24, mike cook wrote: > Le 09/12/

[time-nuts] Sir Patrick Moore

2012-12-10 Thread David C. Partridge
Related to time-nuttery as astonomical observation was used for time-keeping until C20. Sir Patrick Moore, the great amateur astonomer died yesterday at the age of 89. A gentleman, astronomer, and true scholar. His death was predicatable as he's been very ill for a long time, but nonetheless

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A OSMT connector / RS232

2012-12-10 Thread gary
The trip point is specd to be between -3 to +3, which is why 5V works, especially since the trip point is usually positive. I would set it around 1.5V. The transmitters are required to swing +/- 5V. I'm not sure the 232 "allowed" lower voltage as much as all we had to work with were charge pum