Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator" 6GHz synthesizer from ADI

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi If you make the cells in the basement (or even in most factories) the ability to have a wide range synthesizer will come in handy. The whole “6.834xxx GHz” thing is dependent on a number of variables. It is not at all uncommon to produce cells that come out 10’s or 100’s of KHz off of the “

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator" 6GHz synthesizer from ADI

2017-04-11 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
You always want two frequency sources. One generates a carrier frequency offset many MHz from 6.834 GHz and the other frequency source modulates the carrier with a sideband that is at the exact ~6.834 GHz frequency that finds the atomic line. The sideband is in turn modulated with audio to find

Re: [time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
HI > On Apr 11, 2017, at 5:57 PM, jimlux wrote: > > On 4/11/17 12:59 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: >> Hi >> >> Assuming you are doing a “conventional” Rb and Cs there are a number of >> differences. There is the sub set of doing a gas cell based on Cs which is >> a lot more similar to Rb. With the Cs,

Re: [time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
HI > On Apr 11, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist > wrote: > > The "magic" of Rb in a gas cell standard is that you > can make an optical filter cell out of radioactive > Rb87 isotope that allows you to selectively optically pump > to the quantum level you need. It is just "luck" > th

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator" 6GHz synthesizer from ADI

2017-04-11 Thread paul swed
When I read about the frequency generation in the Rb or CS there are normally many numbers associated with the actual frequency. Down to at least the 1 Hz level. Many of these PLLs are intended for multi-KHz steps. I speculate you might need 2 PLLs one thats very fine in I hz increments that gets a

Re: [time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread jimlux
On 4/11/17 12:59 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: Hi Assuming you are doing a “conventional” Rb and Cs there are a number of differences. There is the sub set of doing a gas cell based on Cs which is a lot more similar to Rb. With the Cs, you are building a very complicated vacuum tube that plays with a f

Re: [time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
The "magic" of Rb in a gas cell standard is that you can make an optical filter cell out of radioactive Rb87 isotope that allows you to selectively optically pump to the quantum level you need. It is just "luck" that the absorption line falls where you need it. And the RF pumping is at a doable 6

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread jimlux
On 4/11/17 9:22 AM, Magnus Danielson and Rick Karlquist wrote: This is in the category of projects where if you were qualified to do it, your time is far too valuable to do it for the amount of money you would save. This is the type of project you do not to save any money, but to spend and le

Re: [time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread jimlux
On 4/11/17 12:34 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: Hoi Jim, On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:30:38 -0700 jimlux wrote: I'm looking for a link to point to an explanation (at a basic level) of the difference between Rb and Cs references, and what the tradeoffs are. I googled a bit, but all I got were some explana

Re: [time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread Attila Kinali
Hoi Jim, On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:30:38 -0700 jimlux wrote: > I'm looking for a link to point to an explanation (at a basic level) of > the difference between Rb and Cs references, and what the tradeoffs are. > I googled a bit, but all I got were some explanations of the differences > in things

Re: [time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi Assuming you are doing a “conventional” Rb and Cs there are a number of differences. There is the sub set of doing a gas cell based on Cs which is a lot more similar to Rb. With the Cs, you are building a very complicated vacuum tube that plays with a focused beam of ions traveling in space.

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator" 6GHz synthesizer from ADI

2017-04-11 Thread Alex Pummer
the are 6GHc synthesizer chips from ADI available see here http://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialogue/articles/design-a-direct-6-ghz-local-oscillator.html 73 KJ6UHN Alex On 4/11/2017 8:29 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:31:01 + Andre wrote: Has anyone else either built

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"-- replacing SDRs

2017-04-11 Thread Alex Pummer
YES SDRs [step Recovery Diodes] is hard to find today, but there many-- PIN -- diodes, which exhibits that effect, even some standard rectifier diodes could be used for, despite of that Magnus is right, today are better solutions available e.g. PLLs with 10GHz prescalers 73 KJ6UHN Alex On

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread Lester Veenstra
But, in the true time nuts tradition, I would expect it is time to trap an ion. Lester B Veenstra K1YCM MØYCM W8YCM 6Y6Y les...@veenstras.com -Original Message- From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob kb8tq Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:50 PM To: Discus

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi If you are going to do a Rb, probably the best place to start is with a salvaged physics package out of one of the telecom Rb’s. That would let you get the “easy bits” worked out on your side of the design. It would also let you lear how to address a few of the more complex items sorted as

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 04/11/2017 05:54 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: On 4/11/2017 12:31 AM, Andre wrote: Has anyone else either built an atomic clock around a bare Rb lamp module "core" or attempted Not a DIY project, but I was the RF designer on the HP 10816 rubidium standard, which never made it to

[time-nuts] a link to a explanation of Rb vs Cs?

2017-04-11 Thread jimlux
I'm looking for a link to point to an explanation (at a basic level) of the difference between Rb and Cs references, and what the tradeoffs are. I googled a bit, but all I got were some explanations of the differences in things like vapor pressure, etc. Wikipedia (Atomic_clock) has some nice w

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread Attila Kinali
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:31:01 + Andre wrote: > Has anyone else either built an atomic clock around a bare Rb lamp module > "core" or attempted > > to make a hydrogen maser? Building my own Rb vapor cell standard or H-maser is on my list of Things-I-have-to-do-before-I-die :-) If I had to d

[time-nuts] GPS M code (was: Sinlge ADC multi-band receiver)

2017-04-11 Thread Attila Kinali
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:49:24 -0700 jimlux wrote: > The M-code is described in a fair amount of detail here: > www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA456656 Not really. All it says that it's a BOC(10,5) signal using some code that allows direct aquisition. It doesn't even mention what the rate of th

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
On 4/11/2017 12:31 AM, Andre wrote: Has anyone else either built an atomic clock around a bare Rb lamp module "core" or attempted Not a DIY project, but I was the RF designer on the HP 10816 rubidium standard, which never made it to product introduction (a half dozen working pilot run unit

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Charles Steinmetz
David wrote: If the 10pA specification is guaranteed by design, then wouldn't they have to be testing the 1pA "A" parts? That assumes the parts are produced by exactly the same process, which is very often not a safe assumption. One of them may undergo extra process steps, for example, or o

Re: [time-nuts] Car Clock drift - the lowly 32kHz tuning fork

2017-04-11 Thread Morris Odell
> Most wristwatches do not have any temperature compensation. If worn, the > wristwatch is pretty close at the 25°C (the human body is a quite good and > temperature stable oven). The difference only starts to > show when the watch > isn't worn for long periods of time. That explains my experi

Re: [time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread paul swed
Andre Now I know your location. So your questions make more sense to me. With respect to home brewing atomic standards. There have been numerous threads on time-nuts around this. The fact is technology has obsoleted so many technologies that things like Rb references can be had far cheaper used the

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi If you go back in the thread, it started out as a “general purpose front end” design. One of the suggested parameters on that design was a high impedance input capability in the 1mega ohm range. Noise on a hi-z input is always an issue and input protection just makes it worse. About the

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Charles Steinmetz
David wrote: I ended up qualifying 2N3904s based on manufacturer and lot and I think we ended up using ones from Motorola. I wish detailed process information like National had was available from every manufacturer. It is, if you ask the process engineers for it. (From the Big Boys, that is

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Charles Steinmetz
David wrote: I ended up qualifying 2N3904s based on manufacturer and lot and I think we ended up using ones from Motorola. I wish detailed process information like National had was available from every manufacturer. It is, if you ask the process engineers for it. (From the Big Boys, that is

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Tim Shoppa
I have a really naive question: how can picoamp leakage parts be relevant in low impedance input pulse conditioning to an interval counter? Tim N3QE > On Apr 11, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote: > > Hi > > >> On Apr 11, 2017, at 7:05 AM, Charles Steinmetz wrote: >> >> David wrote: >> >>

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi Testing can mean a lot of different things. Did they test every single part they shipped for every parameter? Did they just do a sample of parts and decide the lot was good? Did they test a sample of parts for a sub-set of the specs and decide they were good? Did they test them after packagin

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi > On Apr 11, 2017, at 7:05 AM, Charles Steinmetz wrote: > > David wrote: > >> I ended up qualifying 2N3904s based on manufacturer and lot and I >> think we ended up using ones from Motorola. I wish detailed process >> information like National had was available from every manufacturer. >

[time-nuts] Re. DIY atomic "resonator"

2017-04-11 Thread Andre
Hi all. As a first step, I wanted to build a specific hydrogen line (1.420 GHz) preamp. Seems that some fluorescent tube starters do emit a very brief burst at around 1.4 GHz during a specific portion of the initial switch-on surge when cold and actually observed this here. Also relevant, th

[time-nuts] Sinlge ADC multi-band receiver

2017-04-11 Thread Mark Sims
I read it took less than a week to discover how to unravel the GLONASS military signals after they were turned on... -- > This approach is known as “security through obscurity”, and is deprecated > in the professional of information security. What one invents, another can > dis

Re: [time-nuts] TAPR TICC boxed (input protection)

2017-04-11 Thread Bill Hawkins
There are other ways that light can cause unexpected behavior. In 1983 I worked on a process control system whose maiden installation was in a corn processing plant, with lots of big valves and motors being controlled. The cards that did A/D and D/A conversion of control signals had UV erasable EP