GPS receiver antenna alarms tend to be "informational" only. They monitor
the current that the antenna is drawing. Better ones report open, short, or
OK. Others provide just an OK / fault. A few have no antenna monitoring at
all. The RFTG-m reports the voltages at each end of a 100
sorry about, but
who is 'lifespeed', a robot or a real person with a natural name?
many thanks,
73, Arnold, DK2WT
Am 17.06.2017 um 23:07 schrieb Lifespeed via time-nuts:
Yes, one has to lock them at a high reference frequency so as to avoid
multiplied-up phase noise. I can manage the
Yes, one has to lock them at a high reference frequency so as to avoid
multiplied-up phase noise. I can manage the tracking loop design. Some
applications aren't line-of-sight, so the radio link doesn't solve every
situation. Fiber optic backup plan, but everybody hates cords.
This is my
Hi
There is a poorman's way of making a -3dB splitter using lengths of cable of
characteristic impedance equal to the system impedance. That is to say using
only 50Ω cable in a 50Ω system. It is a variant on the well known square
four-port quadrature hybrid. In the standard hybrid with ports
Hi,
Yes, I knew that, but wanted to play safe.
Funny how a quick hobbyist quick-and-dirty build was needed to get an
operator running. Ah well.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 06/17/2017 05:46 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
In some cases, you can get away with a 470 ohm resistor on the Tee and leave
out the
Why 100R? If using a 74xxx logic part as the driver is has a maximum
drive current. 100R limits current in case of a short to ground or 5V
supply to only 50mA It is about the lowest value resister i'd want to use
If you need 50 ohm output them go with an small RF amplifier or a
transistors
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Clay Autery wrote:
> This brings up some interesting questions:
>
>
> I am assuming since this is a receive only situation, it will follow
> approximately the same rules of physics that dealing with satellite
> antenna installations.
>
And
Hi
In some cases, you can get away with a 470 ohm resistor on the Tee and leave
out the inductor. A lot depends on
the threshold of the detect circuit in the GPSDO. Since the signal is normally
well amplified before it ever gets to the
splitter, adding a small amount of loss generally is not a
On 6/17/2017 7:40 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
will do a pretty good job of “antenna detect” signaling. In the more general
case
of “I didn’t design this beast” dc blocks and dc shunts to ground is the best
approach.
This fairly quickly gets you headed in the direction of the HP / Symmetricom
Hi,
At one time I had to design a DC-load since the GPSDO did not experience
enough antenna current due to a different antenna being used. So, a
BNC-T was quickly converted with a SMD inductor and resistor to add 150
Ohm of more load, and that helped the telecom operator to get their GPS
out
Clay, as to "why 20 ohms out", there is a long-time-nominal 50 ohm PPS
convention that calls for 5V pulses to be delivered into a 50 ohm load.
If the driving voltage was 5V and source resistance was 50 ohms, then you'd
never get more than 2.5V into the load.
Different references across the net
HI
> On Jun 17, 2017, at 4:15 AM, Clay Autery wrote:
>
> Trying to pin down a reasonably optimal buffer design for bringing PPS
> out... I've looked at all the references, like the i3detroit.org site
> et al.
>
> Of the few schematics and devices I see, most are using a
On 6/16/17 10:55 PM, Lifespeed via time-nuts wrote:
Not too surprising to read locking two crystal oscillators together
without using a physical cable is difficult to impossible.
Essentially what I am looking for is the phase alignment accuracy
(and phase noise) one would get PLL’ing one
On 6/17/2017 4:01 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
>> Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of the
>> chosen resistors?
> It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time.
> If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1
>
THAT was the time is the best comment
>Messaggio originale
>Da: "Will Kimber"
>Data: 17/06/2017 4.22
>A:
>Ogg: Re: [time-nuts] The clocks at Windsor Castle, UK
>
>And when those clocks were made there was no thought that in few
>centuries time a
Hi
If you also need the phase noise of the OCXO’s to be quite good when operating,
the PLL approach has some issues. If you
are after -100 doc / Hz sort of numbers at 1 Hz offset at 100 MHz, then a PLL
to GPS is not your friend. At GPS will degrade
that by many 10’s of db. If the phase
Read the spec sheet on the part you are using for a driver.
The size of the resistor on the paralleled driver side will be set by the
maximum current of the devices.
Decide how conservative a design you want.
Do you want it to drive into a shorted load and survive?
[If each output is rated at 20
Hi
The DC block requirement depends a lot on the design of the GPSDO’s you
are using. With some GPSDO’s a 50 ohm load on the eighth port of a splitter
will do a pretty good job of “antenna detect” signaling. In the more general
case
of “I didn’t design this beast” dc blocks and dc shunts to
I use an HP / Symmetricom 58517A 8 port splitter (the 58536A splitter is a 4
port version and the 58535A is a two port version). They have an amplifier
built in. It is powered by any/all of the the connected GPS devices and feeds
power to the antenna. It work very well... I have it driving 7
caut...@montac.com said:
> Q3: It's only a 1Hz frequency, but is low inductance a desired trait of the
> chosen resistors?
It's a 1 Hz repetition rate, but the bandwidth depends upon the rise time.
If the rise time is ballpark of 1 ns, the bandwidth will be ballpark of 1
GHz. So, yes, you
Trying to pin down a reasonably optimal buffer design for bringing PPS
out... I've looked at all the references, like the i3detroit.org site
et al.
Of the few schematics and devices I see, most are using a hex inverter
(1 into the other 5 paralleled with series resistors for "balance" and
time-nuts@febo.com said:
> Not too surprising to read locking two crystal oscillators together without
> using a physical cable is difficult to impossible. Essentially what I am
> looking for is the phase alignment accuracy (and phase noise) one would get
> PLLâing one oscillator to the other
I guess that is the obvious answer, and sort of how the problem is currently
addressed up to the limits of realistic cable length, which actually cannot be
very long for my application. I am trying to come up with a better way. What
you describe quickly becomes impractical. Again, apologies
> Le 17 juin 2017 à 02:26, Tim Lister a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gregory Beat wrote:
>> I have reached the point that I need a 4-port splitter for my GPS antenna
>> (outdoor 5 volt). Any recommendations of models
Clay wrote:
If sharing an active GPS antenna, do you have to DC block all but one
receiver port to prevent multiple receivers trying to supply current to
the antenna?
Yes. Note that you may need to put DC loads on the other receivers to
fool them into thinking they have an antenna attached
> Le 17 juin 2017 à 01:40, Gregory Beat a écrit :
>
> I have reached the point that I need a 4-port splitter for my GPS antenna
> (outdoor 5 volt). Any recommendations of models (HP/Symmertricom/Microsemi)
> to acquire OR to avoid??
>
> greg
> —
I use Mini-Circuits
> Le 17 juin 2017 à 07:55, Lifespeed via time-nuts a écrit
> :
>
> Not too surprising to read locking two crystal oscillators together without
> using a physical cable is difficult to impossible. Essentially what I am
> looking for is the phase alignment accuracy (and
life-sp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Perhaps I could implement an ISM band radio link for the purpose of locking the
two oscillators. Of course that wouldn't reach a couple miles either.
There appears to be some amount of talking past each other going on here.
First, I think you may have a
28 matches
Mail list logo