Re: [time-nuts] Trimble copy of Z3801

2009-10-28 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
All the the Nortel Tbolts had DOCXO but not the regular Tbolts or the 1/2 Tbolts that have been purchased through time-nuts (though they are nice too). A few lucky people got the ATT bolts (VERY RARE) which have the nice OCXO too but with extra stuff on the board. These nortel tbolts are

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble copy of Z3801

2009-10-27 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
It's a double oven oscillator (vectron I believe) as opposed to the 1/2 tbolts that only have a single oven that everyone else has from the 911 units. This one has other additional features like full power supply conditioning (just add 48v power supply) and can have firmware upgraded.

[time-nuts] Double-Oven Thunderbolt on Ebay

2008-08-08 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Does anyone have a double-oven thunderbolt like the one that's now listed on ebay? If so, do you have any phase-noise or other performance data on it? -Flavio ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Dranetz meter

2008-05-16 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Where did you get the batteries? - Original Message - From: Stanley Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 14:11 Subject: [time-nuts] Dranetz meter Found what I considered a deal on a 646 Dranetz meter, it has plenty of inputs, 3 phase, single

Re: [time-nuts] WIRED Time Nuts, NPR

2007-12-18 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I think you did great! It's too bad you didn't have more time (ironically) to talk about other stuff. I never heard these Bryant Park people before but they sound more like ipod techies more than, true, engineering techies-- it's all good though. - Original Message - From: Tom Van

Re: [time-nuts] HP 5087As for sale

2007-03-30 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
How much do you want for each and/or all three? -Flavio - Original Message - From: Chuck Norton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Time Nuts List Time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 00:06 Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5087As for sale I have 3 of the HP 5087A Distribution amplifiers that I

Re: [time-nuts] Government Liquidation

2007-03-19 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Like jshank, it is a real buyer beware sort of deal even if you can inspect things in person. If you have a problem, the customer service is the worst! You have to wait two weeks for an answer sometimes. Even if your dispute is serious, you may not even have a chance to appeal their

Re: [time-nuts] Need some help with Motorola Oncore VP Back in Binarymode

2007-03-09 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I don't think an 8 channel board will work with a Z3801A. -Flavio - Original Message - From: Don Garlick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 17:37 Subject: [time-nuts] Need some help with Motorola Oncore VP Back in Binarymode Hello I need a little

Re: [time-nuts] HP 5087A manual -- or gain adjustment instructions?

2007-03-03 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Think it's up on Agilent's website. - Original Message - From: John Ackermann N8UR [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 10:04 Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5087A manual -- or gain adjustment instructions?

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt

2007-03-03 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Actually, from what I understand there is no power conditioning board. A regular Thunderbolt has two boards. A processing board and a power conditioning board stacked on top of each other. The power condition board is whole bunch more that just a DC-DC converter. These 1/2 Thunderbolts

Re: [time-nuts] Important RTFG interface information

2007-02-27 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Pins 1 and 5 on each unit control the failover functionallity. If you disconnect them entirely on both the XO and RB units, both units will be in ON mode. But it will be interesting to see what happens when it goes only one way. - Original Message - From: John Ackermann N8UR [EMAIL

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request

2007-02-22 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
1. Same test with a Fluke 6680 yeilds 10MHz mean exactly. 2.Tried different length cables and swapping the cables. Same result. 3. Autocal was done (a few times) - Original Message - From: Tom Van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request

2007-02-22 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I read the same spec on pg 63 but I read it as a fluctuation not an offset. I'm curious if you try the test Bruce suggested and set the gate time to 0.1s and then 0.01s and see if the offset increase by a factor of 10 for each change? I'm finding it hard to believe that this top of the line

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request

2007-02-22 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Ulrich wrote that even with an external time base connected this calibration byte stays active and that you have to set it by hand I tried it, but on my unit calbyte 4 does not have an effect when the external timebase is connect, unlike yours. -thank Flavio - Original Message -

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request

2007-02-22 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Bob, I see what your saying about the frequency error spec on pg vii, but I'm still reading as a fluctuation not an offset of the mean. In my mind, I don't see why there should be some sort of adjustment for this. I really doesn't make sense that the would make a counter that doesn't display

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Possible Solution

2007-02-22 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I have been able to correct the offset problem. The solution fixed the offset problem for both channels A and B and all gate times. I've have written to SRS tech support to ask them if my solution is correct. I will post the solution once they reply-- I don't want people to start playing

[time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request

2007-02-21 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I have an SR620 counter that I set up with a Z3801A as an external reference. If I put a bnc T connector at the output of the Z3801A and use two equal length bnc cables, one to the ext. ref input on the back and the other to channel A then do a frequency measurement, I get a mean that is about

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request

2007-02-21 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Your SR620 is well within its specifications, the tolerance for this test is -0.0035 Hz to + 0.0035 Hz. The readings fluctuate by that amount, but the mean is still off by -0.00150 Hz. Changing cable length... Tried it, no difference. 25Ohm load with two terms Tried all variations of

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request -- A thought

2007-02-21 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Here's a thought. Perhaps there is a problem with the rear reference input; A and B channels are fine since they read the same error. The question is Is there a way of adjusting the Reference Input so that it correctly read the 10Mhz input? I tried the same setup with my other counter and it

Re: [time-nuts] SRS SR620 External Source Issue -- Help Request -- A thought

2007-02-21 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
...if my model is correct the apparent offset in the mean will be increased by a factor of 10 over that for a a 1 second gate time. Bruce Looks like you're right Bruce. I did both 1, 0.1 and 0.01 gate times and the error increased by a factor of 10. And it doesn't sound like this is a

Re: [time-nuts] Some additional RTFG learnings

2007-02-20 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I got similar results in that the rb oscillators are not GPS disciplined after a 72 hr run. I started off by manually offsetting the frequency of a warmed up rb unit by doing a manual adjustment to the rb oscillator via the manual adjustment pot so that it would be approximately 0.0050Hz off

Re: [time-nuts] Some additional RTFG learnings

2007-02-20 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
It is not unlikely that there is a DAC for that voltage so that factory and field calibrations can be done from a remote location. I'm not sure in this case. Lucent put an awful lot of stuff in the RB unit for it to be just green light. ___

Re: [time-nuts] Some additional RTFG learnings

2007-02-20 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I traced out where most of the interface connections went to. I don't remember exactly what I found out, but I remember it was rather straight foward so I'm leaning towards it being a simple cross over. What I'm not sure about is the logic that selects the XO or the RB to be ON. But I'm

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt - Hardware Versions - Performance Differenences

2007-02-17 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I saw the vendor put up new pictures of the Thunderbolt that he has hundreds of up in his auction . The pictures aren't very clear but it looks as though HALF of the Thunderbolt is missing. There doesn't seem to be any power conditioning board. Am I wrong about this? - Original

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt - Hardware Versions - Performance Differenences

2007-02-17 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
**That's a big problem if there is no power conditioning board. ** The DC-DC converter is very expensive itself and there is A LOT of filtering before it AND that's all after a DC input!!! I saw somebody suggested a cheap switching power supply as a power source, but that will not be

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt - Shipping Outside the USA

2007-02-16 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
have to pay (though I think anyone here would be willing to list a low value as a gift to help minimize those costs). The problem is that if your sending that many at once, customs will get suspicious about the cost AND do you really want to send that many without being properly insured .

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt - Hardware Versions - Performance Differneces

2007-02-15 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
There are different hardware variations of the Thunderbolt out there. There is the commercially available Thunderbolt which available from Trimble that everyone is familiar with, and then there are the industrial versions that are made for the telecoms. The Andrews E-911 version,

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt - Hardware Versions Performance Differences

2007-02-15 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
John Miles wrote: People with Z3801As tend to fiddle with them until the cows come home in my experience, and that's fine if that's what you're into, but... wait, what list is this again? :) I put my info and experience with Thunderbolts out there for the NUTS in this mail list. I have a few

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt - Hardware Versions - Performance Differenences

2007-02-15 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Take note that it is a very short auction-- 3 day. I would interpret this as the seller trying to do a quick test of the waters--possible nervousness. Note, no minimum bid yet. I still contend there is no market for these items at this price. Only people who don't follow this group will be

Re: [time-nuts] TRIMBLE GPS RECEIVER MODULE PART# B12118-13321

2007-02-13 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Someone just posted Thunderbolt type boards for $275 on ebay. Claims might have a better oscillator then stock Thunderbolt and 5 10mhz outs + power supply. Still a good deal. Only three though. - Original Message - From: Robert Deliƫn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of precise time

Re: [time-nuts] Lucent RFTG-m-XO

2007-02-06 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I had the exact same problem as yours. I discoverd that my 106B had a 6-channel board in it vs. the 8-channel that is supposed to be in there. I put a 8-channel board in and the fault and GPS lights went out. - Original Message - From: Robert E. Martinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [time-nuts] RFTG on ebay

2007-02-01 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
Fair enough. I just thought they're pricing strategy kind of funny (and I don't mean funny-ha-ha). It seems the price suddenly went up $100 as soon as some posts some progress on time-nuts. If you don't want me to continue this thread, I won't. It just seems they're taken advantage of your

Re: [time-nuts] RFTG on ebay

2007-02-01 Thread TheInfamousFlavio
I saw the $20 thing, more weirdness. Anyway, that's wasn't my point. That post said that they have only two RB units left, but eleven are up on ebay?!?! - Original Message - From: Jason Rabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'