Of Magnus Danielson
Sent: giovedì 13 gennaio 2011 5.34
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz Oscillator comparison part II
On 12/01/11 19:24, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
If you have a random frequency like 7.352 MHz that neither divides or
multiplies to 10 MHz harmonic or sub harmonic, you
2011 5.34
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz Oscillator comparison part II
On 12/01/11 19:24, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
If you have a random frequency like 7.352 MHz that neither divides or
multiplies to 10 MHz harmonic or sub harmonic, you can indeed mix the
signal to 10
multiplication by mixing down.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Perry Sandeen
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 6:39 PM
To: time-nuts-requ...@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] 10 MHz Oscillator comparison part II
List
On 12/01/11 19:24, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
If you have a random frequency like 7.352 MHz that neither divides or
multiplies to 10 MHz harmonic or sub harmonic, you can indeed mix the signal
to 10 MHz.
If you do so, you will need to filter the outputs, since the mixing spurs
will mess up the input
List,
Wrote: However the exercise is probably pointless as the frequency difference
between the 2 signals as seen at the output of the cascaded divide and mix
chains are reduced by this scheme.
Umm. I guess I didn’t express my thoughts effectively enough.
The idea is to subtract 9 MHz in
Perry Sandeen wrote:
List,
Wrote: However the exercise is probably pointless as the frequency difference
between the 2 signals as seen at the output of the cascaded divide and mix
chains are reduced by this scheme.
Umm. I guess I didn’t express my thoughts effectively enough.
The idea is
