Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-05 Thread Scott Newell
At 07:09 AM 10/5/2011, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: The mailing list system resends messages rather than just relaying them. List messages won't show details of the originating sender path. Really? It appears to me that your message was sent from 10.73.100.66 through a dsl line

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-05 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
No, you're correct. The Mailman system adds a bunch of headers and changes the from and reply-to headers (don't recall the exact details, but there's a bounce-detection scheme called VERP that causes more than the normal amount of rewriting), and adds [time-nuts] to the subject line, but it

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-05 Thread Bob Smither
Scott Newell wrote: At 07:09 AM 10/5/2011, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: The mailing list system resends messages rather than just relaying them. List messages won't show details of the originating sender path. Really? It appears to me that your message was sent from 10.73.100.66 through a

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-04 Thread J. Forster
- Original Message - From: Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 2:04 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing) I'm not convinced. Notice that the to: line contains

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-04 Thread Alan Melia
ISP looks after your webmail address list. Alan G3NYK - Original Message - From: Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing) I'm not convinced

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-04 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing) I'm not convinced. Notice that the to: line contains a list of addresses that look like they would belong in a time-nut's address book. That wouldn't be beneficial, or necessary if the spammer was spoofing his way into febo's servers. I think this came from

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-04 Thread J. Forster
would be leery of social network ABI (Address Book Import) for one thing. -Greg - Original Message - From: Chuck Harriscfhar...@erols.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 2:04 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 2

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-04 Thread Chuck Harris
Hi John, I have looked at the originating IP's in the headers, and I find a curious thing: They are all built and structured differently. Those on the messages I send through time-nuts don't have my IP listed as originating... or listed at all. The header information I find in the messages

Re: [time-nuts] 2 (Spoofing)

2011-10-04 Thread Robert Watzlavick
I used to get tons (100-300 a day) of backscatter emails - emails that were supposedly sent by me but bounced back because the recipient didn't really exist. I use a web hosting company for my website and email so I had them enable SPF (Sender Policy Framework) on my domain and all that