From: "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 5371A / 5372A replacement
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:32 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> James,
>
> If your measurement reqires a continuous time record (8K events - max), then
> there is no
James,
If your measurement reqires a continuous time record (8K events - max), then
there is no current replacement for the 5372A.
For some things this zero dead time capability is important, otherwise the
modern counters already mentioned are quite good,
but be prepared to have your wallet clea
From: "Salisbury, JG \(James\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [time-nuts] 5371A / 5372A replacement
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:05:38 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> What is the modern equivalent of the 5372A and the 5371A time and
> frequency ana
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hal Murray
Sent: 06 March 2007 09:14
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 5371A / 5372A replacement
> What is the modern equivalent of the 5372A and the 5371A time and
> fr
> What is the modern equivalent of the 5372A and the 5371A time and
> frequency analysers.
Agilent's web site normally has some info on old gear. Just poke the part
number into their search box. Usually, that includes a link to their current
replacement. Unfortunately, both of them say "no r
Hi,
What is the modern equivalent of the 5372A and the 5371A time and
frequency analysers. I am also looking for lab view drivers for the
5371/5372 any pointers?
Thanks
___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mail
