???
I read the post as essentially "politics trumps science and engineering",
which is sadly very much the truth.
YMMV,
-John
==
> Bill,
>
> Thanks for once again making one of the more useless and deluded posts I
> have seen recently.
>
> Keep up the consistent work.
>
>
>
> On
And thanks for furrowing new fields of inanity, Rex. If that is your best
riposte, don't join a debating team.
I'm not trolling, guys. I'm merely expressing an opinion, something that
others manage to do here without incurring even a tepid rebuke like Rex's.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, R
Bill,
Thanks for once again making one of the more useless and deluded posts I
have seen recently.
Keep up the consistent work.
On 6/5/2011 8:05 AM, William H. Fite wrote:
Thanks for a cleansing breath of fresh air, Charles. The paranoia and
cynicism were reaching toxic levels.
As diffic
Thanks for a cleansing breath of fresh air, Charles. The paranoia and
cynicism were reaching toxic levels.
As difficult as it is for us scientists and engineers to accept, science is
not and never will be the sole epistemological paradigm, nor will it ever
resolve all the woes of humankind.
Whic
FCC commissioners are appointed for 12 year terms. I don't think the
current president has had a chance to appoint one yet (?)
Commissioners are appointed for 5-year terms.
President Obama appointed three of the current/recent Commissioners
(Chairman Genachowski and Commissioners Clyburn an
In this case, it seems that the FCC listened to a bunch of
hog wash, without doing any sort of correct testing beforehand, and now
that it's after the fact, have been caught with their pants down about
their ankles.
Now, it's up to who has the deepest pockets, and the most
political pull, in wh
FCC commissioners are appointed for 12 year terms. I don't think the
current president has had a chance to appoint one yet (?) Precious
administration had a strong "anti-science", pro business bias. This
might explain things.The 12 year terms explains why this happens
under both parties.
On
most open administration
>ever?
>
>Joe
>
>-Original Message-
>From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
>Behalf Of Will Matney
>Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 6:25 PM
>To: time-nuts@febo.com
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Clearest art
> http://www.gpsworld.com/machine-control-ag/news/john-deere-massive-lightsquared-interference-with-no-solution-sight-11712
>
> Many unanswered questions about how LightSquared got the FCC to
> do an end run around established rulemaking procedures on such an
> important issue. Woodward and Bernst
-nuts] Clearest article yet on LightSquared's threat to
GPS
After reading this, and especially the part at the end, John Deere fears
that politics, government officials, along with certain deep pockets
greasing the wheels, will over rule common sense. I'm like Deere, in that I
would want any and
After reading this, and especially the part at the end, John Deere fears
that politics, government officials, along with certain deep pockets
greasing the wheels, will over rule common sense. I'm like Deere, in that I
would want any and all talks open to the public, and open to the current L
band,
On 06/04/2011 06:35 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
http://www.gpsworld.com/machine-control-ag/news/john-deere-massive-lightsquared-interference-with-no-solution-sight-11712
Many unanswered questions about how LightSquared got the FCC to do an
end run around established rulemaking proce
http://www.gpsworld.com/machine-control-ag/news/john-deere-massive-lightsquared-interference-with-no-solution-sight-11712
Many unanswered questions about how LightSquared got the FCC to do an end run
around established rulemaking procedures on such an important issue. Woodward
and Bernstein, w
13 matches
Mail list logo
