In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
>For a project I'm doing this summer I've looked at
>quite a few old and new GPS OEM recievers.
>
>One possible alternative, which I've been testing this
>week, is a Trimble Resolution-T GPS Timing Receiver.
>
>Since you asked, the preliminary
Jim Miller wrote:
> Another (probably crazy) thought came to mind... I wonder if the
> GNURadio can be used to demodulate signals at L1 either directly or
> through a downconverter/LNB.. We could make a software defined GPS
> receiver - a GNUGPS! Twiddling the software could make it support
For a project I'm doing this summer I've looked at
quite a few old and new GPS OEM recievers.
One possible alternative, which I've been testing this
week, is a Trimble Resolution-T GPS Timing Receiver.
Since you asked, the preliminary test report is at:
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/res-t/
/t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim Miller writes:
>
>On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> The really interesting one would be to get a pci board with the
>> "host-assisted" SiRF GPS chip and be able to do our own math on
>> the raw measurements :-)
>
>Another (probably crazy)
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The really interesting one would be to get a pci board with the
"host-assisted" SiRF GPS chip and be able to do our own math on
the raw measurements :-)
Another (probably crazy) thought came to mind... I wonder if the
GNURadio can be use
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The really interesting one would be to get a pci board with the
"host-assisted" SiRF GPS chip and be able to do our own math on
the raw measurements :-)
That would be neat.
ISTR that the Garmin GPS-25 boards could be coerced to give raw d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bjorn Gabrielsson writes:
>Jim Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>=20
>> > Has anybody tried to contact SiRF ?
>>=20
>> I have not, it was my understanding that SiRF is a chipset company,
>> not a sensor b
Jim Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> > Has anybody tried to contact SiRF ?
>
> I have not, it was my understanding that SiRF is a chipset company,
> not a sensor board mfg; however I could very well be mistaken.
They are a _big_ ch
ly 20, 2005 7:59 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject:[time-nuts] GPS timing receivers - what now?
Hi,
Now that the future of the Motorola timing receivers is uncertain due
to the SiRF sale, does anyone have a favorite replacement receiver
for timing? Sy
On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Has anybody tried to contact SiRF ?
I have not, it was my understanding that SiRF is a chipset company,
not a sensor board mfg; however I could very well be mistaken.
Jim
___
time-nuts mai
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim Miller writes:
>Hi,
>
>Now that the future of the Motorola timing receivers is uncertain due
>to the SiRF sale, does anyone have a favorite replacement receiver
>for timing? Synergy quoted me 2-4 weeks on an M12+ and eval board but
>did not sound certain th
Hi,
Now that the future of the Motorola timing receivers is uncertain due
to the SiRF sale, does anyone have a favorite replacement receiver
for timing? Synergy quoted me 2-4 weeks on an M12+ and eval board but
did not sound certain that it would even be available at all.
Thanks,
Jim
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
