Scott Newell newell+timenuts@... writes:
My linux parallel port WWVB 'scope got a bit confused at the leap
second:
I have coded a WWVB receiver according to the published standard. It is
all homebrew with an embedded processor and disciplined OXCO.
I did not do any display shots (didn't
At 09:23 PM 6/30/2015, Tom Van Baak wrote:
That's a nice WWVB result. Yes, the triple marker pulse looks is
correct for a positive leap second. What did you use for a receiver?
The receiver module and ferrite bar antenna from a Westclox 70026
desktop 'atomic clock', as available from Walmart
My linux parallel port WWVB 'scope got a bit confused at the leap second:
Tue Jun 30 23:58:59 2015 | | X
Tue Jun 30 23:59:00 2015 | | X
Tue Jun 30 23:59:01 2015 | -
: [time-nuts] Leap second results: WWVB
My linux parallel port WWVB 'scope got a bit confused at the leap second:
...
Tue Jun 30 23:59:57 2015 | - | 1
Tue Jun 30 23:59:58 2015 | - | 1
Tue Jun 30 23:59:59
