Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-27 Thread Adrian Godwin
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Steve Wiseman wrote: > > There are mailing lists for this stuff, chaps - openpnp, firepick, > versatronics, plenty of others. All full of people finding out that, > like everything, it's trickier than you first think. See you over > there, let time nuts be time nu

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-26 Thread Chris Albertson
OpenPNP has a set of drivers for each class of PNP machine. One of the drivers outputs LinuxCNC g-code, They already have other drivers for other kinds of machines, maybe 8 or 10 in total. Yes you could translate centroid files to G-code but that is exactly what openPNP does. It does a little m

[time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-25 Thread Mark Sims
If OpenPnp generates a gcode file for a particular CNC controller (say Linux CNC) my program can easily translate it into something pretty much any other CNC machine can read (including some machines that have not existed for over 40 years). It would not be hard to add the ability to read a sta

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-25 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The vision stuff comes in a few ways: 1) Your board needs to be aligned to the machine. There may or may not be accurate holes in the board to do this. Doing it with holes still leaves you with the need to get the board location “into” the machine’s coordinate system. 2) Tapes come in fair

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-25 Thread Steve Wiseman
On 25 June 2016 at 05:28, Mark Sims wrote: > Vision system is nice, but a decent CNC is more than accurate enough for > 0402 sized parts. Again, surface tension is your friend. There's often more positional slop within the tape pocket than the pin pitch, for components more tricky than 0402s.

[time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Mark Sims
I have seen pick and place systems built around CNC machines (same applies to 3D printers). The reel strips are fed through a slotted guide. The pickup head has a finger (or some use the pickup nozzle... a flat tipped hypodermic needle) that is used to advance the reel. It drops down into th

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:41:05 -0500 Oz-in-DFW wrote: > On 6/24/2016 8:23 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > The advantage of "professional" > > companies like Alktech over "hobbyist" companies like macrofab is, > > that you get full professional support while the price does not differ much. > > E.g. wh

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Chris Albertson
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Don Latham wrote: > I do not see why a small pick and place assist system could not be built on a > 3-d printer. You are not the first to think of this. But the problem is 1) moving the reels of parts, 2) programming the machine. Translating the PCB design

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Adrian Godwin
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > The trick is to use semi-manual pick&place machines for low volumes. > Ie machines that you do not program, but guide by hand. This allows > faster and more accurate placing of components than would be possible > with a pure manual process

[time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Mark Sims
I've done a over one hundred boards with a Kapton stencil without any problems (0603 size parts) and 50 boards with a stencil cut out of vellum paper (a plasticized paper available at craft stores, red cuts very well with 405nm lasers) by my home-made laser cutter head for a desktop CNC mill

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi A “low cost” auto pick and place does have some things in common with a 3D printer: Drive is by stepper motors Micro stepping stepper motor drivers are used Belt drive is pretty common Tube support and circular ball bearings are generally used You have X, Y and Z drive Very custom software to

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread David
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 20:01:24 +0100, you wrote: >... > >I definitely concur with the 'make it SMT as much as possible' plan - >pin-mount stuff is a pain. Also, QFN is far preferable to QFP, as >catalogue suppliers don't always manage to ship fine-pitch stuff >without bending legs in one direction o

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Steve Wiseman
On 24 June 2016 at 14:23, Attila Kinali wrote: > Unlike what most people seem to think, small batches of PCBs have always > been a business for some assembly companies. For my sins, I am one of those... (Cambridge, UK). Yes - semi-manual assembly is the way it goes, especially for the active par

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Graham / KE9H
Don Latham said to Discussion I do not see why a small pick and place assist system could not be built on a 3-d printer. Lots of problems to be solved... How do you take loose parts or cut tape or tape reels and get the right part out, and into the chuck, oriented in the right direction? How man

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you are doing a board with a few hundred parts on it (as earlier mentioned). And have designed a “3D printer” pick and place that runs one reel at a time. And are running the printer slow to keep everything from going all over the place. And have a manual reel advance (no feeder) …. I c

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 6/24/2016 8:23 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:28:15 + (UTC) > Bob Stewart wrote: Lotsa stuff deleted >> One more related question before this topic dies, if you don't mind. >> What about the other side of building: stuffing the boards. My GPSDOs >> have about 120 parts p

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 6/24/2016 9:32 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:16:34 -0500 > Oz-in-DFW wrote: >> Solder stencils make **all** the difference. > Oh, yes! Please, do not try syringe dispensers! These fail more often than > they work. Also pay the additional couple of bucks to get a steel stenci

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi: For IC pitches of 0.050" (1.27mm) hand soldering works fine, even for my vision when a stereo microscope is used. Elmer's glue to hold the chips is place. Getting boards from ExpressPCB that have solder mask helps to prevent bridging. Here is an example: http://www.prc68.com/I/BTSG.shtml

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Don Latham
I do not see why a small pick and place assist system could not be built on a 3-d printer. Don > On Jun 24, 2016, at 8:32 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:16:34 -0500 > Oz-in-DFW wrote: > >> 1. Pick and place machines use a lot of floor space (even for the >>"small" one

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:16:34 -0500 Oz-in-DFW wrote: > 1. Pick and place machines use a lot of floor space (even for the > "small" ones are more than 1/2 a bench.) > 2. Even the best ones require pretty continuous tuning. If you aren't > using them continuously each new run is a new and

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
On 6/23/2016 9:36 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > The gotcha with “really slow” is that once you print the solder paste on the > board, it has a very > limited “open air” life. If you don’t get the board done fairly quickly, your > soldering quality can > suffer quite a bit. > > Bob > For most of t

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:28:15 + (UTC) Bob Stewart wrote: > One more related question before this topic dies, if you don't mind. > What about the other side of building: stuffing the boards. My GPSDOs > have about 120 parts per board, plus some custom work on the SMA connectors. > Is there a s

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Oz-in-DFW
Disclaimer: I've not used any of these yet. New style assembly houses are MUCH cheaper than traditional proto shops. The ones I'm planning on trying are: Macrofab (Houston) https://macrofab.com/ pcb:ng http://pcb.ng/index.html (currently in beta with **deep** discounts. $1/sq in + BoM cost

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-24 Thread Bob Stewart
-- GFS GPSDO list: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info On Thu, 6/23/16, Oz-in-DFW wrote: Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement&qu

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Oz-in-DFW
I'll second this, and suggest you consider: 1. Pick and place machines use a lot of floor space (even for the "small" ones are more than 1/2 a bench.) 2. Even the best ones require pretty continuous tuning. If you aren't using them continuously each new run is a new and different exp

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The gotcha with “really slow” is that once you print the solder paste on the board, it has a very limited “open air” life. If you don’t get the board done fairly quickly, your soldering quality can suffer quite a bit. Bob > On Jun 23, 2016, at 8:58 PM, Chris Albertson > wrote: > > This

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Graham / KE9H
We use "Advanced Assembly" in Colorado for prototype assembly. http://aa-pcbassembly.com/ For just one or two boards, it is faster to hand solder the parts, as long as no BGA's or similar. If complex soldering like BGAs, or more than three boards, we use a proto assembly house. --- Graham == O

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Chris Albertson
This is a very important topic for anyone who wants to build state of the art electronic today. You can't continue to live in the 1970s using DIP parts with 0.1 inch leads. So how to make small batches of custom designs. The pick and place machine could be very inexpensive if you are willing to

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Henry Hallam
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Nick Sayer via time-nuts wrote: > It all sort of depends on what you call “reasonable.” PNP assembly is a bit > like PCB fab in that there are rather large set-up costs and the per-unit > cost after that is quite low, which favors volume. > > Any way you slice it

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Bob Camp
let this die. Thanks for the responses! > > Bob > > --- > GFS GPSDO list: > groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info > > ---- > On Thu, 6/23/16

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread jimlux
On 6/23/16 2:56 PM, jimlux wrote: On 6/23/16 12:28 PM, Bob Stewart wrote: One more related question before this topic dies, if you don't mind. What about the other side of building: stuffing the boards. My GPSDOs have about 120 parts per board, plus some custom work on the SMA connectors. Is t

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Bob Stewart
e-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board To: "Bob Stewart" , "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" Date: Thursday, June 23, 2016, 5:27 PM Hi Around here, assuming: 1) You supply all the parts on full reels with leaders 2) There is

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Around here, assuming: 1) You supply all the parts on full reels with leaders 2) There is no hand assembly work 3) You already have framed stencils that are the correct size for their gear 4) You have multiple proper solder and placement fiducials on both sides 5) The boards are designed to

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread jimlux
On 6/23/16 12:28 PM, Bob Stewart wrote: One more related question before this topic dies, if you don't mind. What about the other side of building: stuffing the boards. My GPSDOs have about 120 parts per board, plus some custom work on the SMA connectors. Is there a service out there that w

Re: [time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Nick Sayer via time-nuts
I’ve done quite a bit of this. My assembler of choice is Small Batch Assembly. It all sort of depends on what you call “reasonable.” PNP assembly is a bit like PCB fab in that there are rather large set-up costs and the per-unit cost after that is quite low, which favors volume. Any way you sli

[time-nuts] OT stuffing boards: was GPS interface/prototyping board

2016-06-23 Thread Bob Stewart
One more related question before this topic dies, if you don't mind. What about the other side of building: stuffing the boards. My GPSDOs have about 120 parts per board, plus some custom work on the SMA connectors. Is there a service out there that will populate boards with SMT components fo