well,that is a good question. Knowing the publishing industry a yea after
submission of the manuscript , so end of 2018 if we pull our act together
...
In a message dated 8/18/2017 6:31:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
wb4...@wb4gcs.org writes:
When will it be available??
Jim
When will it be available??
Jim
wb4...@amsat.org
On 8/18/2017 4:17 PM, Dr. Ulrich L. Rohde via time-nuts wrote:
Yes, and there is a lot of useful material in place including CMOS and related
new topics and update on numerical controlled oscillators . Thanks, Ulrich
Sent from my iPhone
Yes, and there is a lot of useful material in place including CMOS and related
new topics and update on numerical controlled oscillators . Thanks, Ulrich
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 2:58 PM, David Bengtson wrote:
>
> That's good news. It would be good
That's good news. It would be good to have a single reference for noise
correlation.
Dave
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:04 AM wrote:
> Good Morning all ,
>
> yes , it became non trivial but Enrico agreed to take over the old chapter
> 2. He thinks I do not use IEEE norm
Good Morning all ,
yes , it became non trivial but Enrico agreed to take over the old chapter
2. He thinks I do not use IEEE norm abbreviation and the noise correlation
part did not exist 20 years ago.And many new and important things So I
thing we are settled.
Thanks, Ulrich
In a
Ulrich - Did anyone ever agree to help update this?
Regards
Dave
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, KA2WEU--- via time-nuts wrote:
>
> Why don't you look at the outline to determine what might be needed or
> missing .
>
> Ulrich
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/11/2016
Why don't you look at the outline to determine what might be needed or
missing .
Ulrich
In a message dated 3/11/2016 11:09:51 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
att...@kinali.ch writes:
Hoi Ulrich,
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:58 -0500
KA2WEU--- via time-nuts wrote:
Thanks, that why I try to keep it alive, Ulrich
In a message dated 3/9/2016 5:08:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
brent.ev...@gmail.com writes:
Ulrich -
I checked my bookshelf last night and sure enough, Rhode's "Digital PLL
Frequency Synthesizers - Theory and Design" is still sitting
Ulrich -
I checked my bookshelf last night and sure enough, Rhode's "Digital PLL
Frequency Synthesizers - Theory and Design" is still sitting faithfully
there (I thought it might have been lost with my missing copy of "Microwave
Transistor Amplifiers by Gonzales). I remember getting it directly
Hi Ulrich and Jim,
On 03/08/2016 07:11 PM, jimlux wrote:
The people who really know about this stuff do it for a living, all the
time, and probably don't have a lot of free time. I've done a couple of
book chapters, and it's an enormous amount of work, and that's with
collaborators and editors
Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of KA2WEU---
via time-nuts
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:57 AM
To: rich...@karlquist.com; time-nuts@febo.com
Cc: enrico.rubi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PLL book 3rd edition
yes, but the underlying math
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of KA2WEU--- via
time-nuts
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:57 AM
To: rich...@karlquist.com; time-nuts@febo.com
Cc: enrico.rubi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PLL book 3rd edition
yes, but the underlying math
; time-nuts@febo.com
Cc: enrico.rubi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PLL book 3rd edition
yes, but the underlying math and system architecture will/would be
exciting.
Thanks, for the comments, Ulrich
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts
Correct, unless yo want to sell PLL chips, DDS and NCO's and their use
needs to be explained ! Ulrich
In a message dated 3/8/2016 2:01:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jim...@earthlink.net writes:
On 3/8/16 8:27 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
>
>
> On 3/8/2016 3:18 AM,
On 3/8/2016 10:11 AM, jimlux wrote:
Or is subject to export controls because of the specific application.
While you could probably "generalize" it to get out from under export
controls, that's a lot of work. Ulrich and Rick raise interesting points:
The people who really know about this
On 3/8/16 8:27 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
On 3/8/2016 3:18 AM, ka2...@aol.com wrote:
Good Morning,
technically you are correct, most buy what they find and live with a
compromise. But companies like mine, R, test equipment , need superior
performance and many parts which we need, we
: "jimlux" <jim...@earthlink.net>
À : time-nuts@febo.com
Envoyé 08/03/2016 14:30:51
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] PLL book 3rd edition
>On 3/8/16 12:19 AM, Stéphane Rey wrote:
>>Hi Rick,
>>
>>There are hopefully many applications where monolythics PLL can't
>&
yes, but the underlying math and system architecture will/would be
exciting.
Thanks, for the comments, Ulrich
In a message dated 3/8/2016 11:29:25 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rich...@karlquist.com writes:
On 3/8/2016 3:18 AM, ka2...@aol.com wrote:
> Good Morning,
> technically you
On 3/8/2016 3:18 AM, ka2...@aol.com wrote:
Good Morning,
technically you are correct, most buy what they find and live with a
compromise. But companies like mine, R, test equipment , need superior
performance and many parts which we need, we have made by foundries.
Numerically controlled
the approach is different than for
PLLs I'm designing for radiocom...
Stephane, F1TJJ
-- Message d'origine --
De : "jimlux" <jim...@earthlink.net>
À : time-nuts@febo.com
Envoyé 08/03/2016 14:30:51
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] PLL book 3rd edition
On 3/8/16 12:19 AM, Stéphane Rey
Yes, and an extension of my book should address these issues
Ulrich
In a message dated 3/8/2016 10:02:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jim...@earthlink.net writes:
On 3/8/16 12:19 AM, Stéphane Rey wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> There are hopefully many applications where monolythics PLL can't
>
On 3/8/16 12:19 AM, Stéphane Rey wrote:
Hi Rick,
There are hopefully many applications where monolythics PLL can't
achieve the requested functionalitities or performances so that there is
still room to build block PLLs. I'm still desiging such things for my
job for instance.
As do we at JPL.
Hi
The one area that the chips have not quite yet taken over is the whole
“software defined
loop” or digital PLL. A GPSDO is one example of this, there are a number of
other odd
little niche areas they show up.
Indeed, it’s been maybe 20 years since I put a non-software PLL in a product
Good Morning,
technically you are correct, most buy what they find and live with a
compromise. But companies like mine, R, test equipment , need superior
performance and many parts which we need, we have made by foundries.
Numerically
controlled oscillators belong to this and modern IQ
--
De : "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <rich...@karlquist.com>
À : ka2...@aol.com; "Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com>
Cc: enrico.rubi...@gmail.com
Envoyé 08/03/2016 04:33:24
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] PLL book 3rd editi
I know for me, I mainly use the "synthesizer on a chip" IC's
from Analog Devices/Hittite and National. Their data sheets
and ap notes serve as the "textbook". I'm not sure there
will be much call going forward for a book on fundamentals
that explains how to design synthesizers from first
26 matches
Mail list logo