[time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2015-07-02 Thread Burt I. Weiner
Gang, You will remember a few years ago I had problems with my DATUM 9390-52054 GPS Time Code and Frequency Standards. For those that were not involved at the time but might be curious about the history of my grief with these units, I have included one of my epistles for background purposes

[time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-15 Thread Burt I. Weiner
Another update... I wanted to post more in the hopes that it may help someone else with similar problems. I told you about adding the simple voltage divider to reduce the drive to the circuits following the replacement of the original oscillator module. When I thought all was well I put the

Re: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-14 Thread David I. Emery
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:23:50PM +0200, Luciano Paramithiotti wrote: > I have a 9390-53120. The 16.368 reference for the GPS is coming from a > 4 pin (14 pin size ) oscillator on the GPS interface board. > The other internal oscillator board mount a 1 MHz TCXO I never had > seen locked to GPS. >

[time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-14 Thread Burt I. Weiner
From what you're describing, this is what I have, and this could explain why I had trouble getting the unit to lock. Now that I've replaced the 10 MHz oscillator, the receiver finds and starts tracking satellites within about 3 minutes from an overnight off. Burt, K6OQK At 06:24 AM 4/14/2013

Re: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-14 Thread Luciano Paramithiotti
I have a 9390-53120. The 16.368 reference for the GPS is coming from a 4 pin (14 pin size ) oscillator on the GPS interface board. The other internal oscillator board mount a 1 MHz TCXO I never had seen locked to GPS. Normally I use it only for UTC time display. This GPS use an antenna with 50dB ga

Re: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-13 Thread David I. Emery
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:48:47AM -0700, Burt I. Weiner wrote: > Sorry for the delay in posting this update. Things have been hectic, > and then there was NAB. > > Here's what I've discovered: The receiver started working after > about 6 hours of just sitting. However, the 9390's internal Ve

Re: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-13 Thread Rob Kimberley
o.com Subject: [time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again... Sorry for the delay in posting this update. Things have been hectic, and then there was NAB. Here's what I've discovered: The receiver started working after about 6 hours of just sitting. However, the 9390's interna

[time-nuts] UPDATE: DATUM 9390-52054 Grief again...

2013-04-12 Thread Burt I. Weiner
Sorry for the delay in posting this update. Things have been hectic, and then there was NAB. Here's what I've discovered: The receiver started working after about 6 hours of just sitting. However, the 9390's internal Vectron oscillator was quite a ways off frequency and did not want to lock