- Original Message -
From: Mike Feher mfe...@eozinc.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 4:35:37 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Well, I really have not contributed
and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Since when is the Anarchist Cookbook censored??? I have an original copy
that I'm saving for a sale about 30 years from now. ($$$ I hope) It's really
a rather simple publication with too much obvious
Here are some exploding targets that are legal:
http://www.tannerite.com/
A friend uses them and swears by them.
On 11/3/2010 11:28 PM, jimlux wrote:
Michael Conlen wrote:
There's always nitroglycerin. I've heard it reacts well to vibration.
nitromethane is much more readily available and
Be careful about giving legal advice. These are not legal where I live.
Making explosives in any quantity is legal at a federal level in all 50
states without any kind of license but those darn states and cities make
laws to restrict that. Mixing tannerite turns it into a federally, state,
and
-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Be careful about giving legal advice. These are not legal where I live.
Making explosives in any quantity is legal at a federal level in all 50
states without any kind
measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
I wasn't giving legal advice... just pointing out one can purchase the
targets (not make them). Be legal and obey all laws... if you have to
purchase through someone with a FFL make sure the transfer is legal (or even
Timenutters--
The question was asked-- Why can't a large aperture
high-resolution optic be used to locate bullet holes
in a target at 800 yards?
Consider this--: I often shoot at targets on the
600 yard berm at the Manatee Range (near Bradenton,
FL). Typically, by 11AM the
My first chore is to investigate what kind of pulse
rise-times I get from a selection of inexpensive
ultrasonic sensors when a supersonic bullet passes
within a couple of feet from them. I have a Tek
2252 scope that I can place downrange to look at the
sensors with but
How about a rubber-mirror, adaptive optics? We use this on our
large telescopes to overcome the atmospheric scintillation, otherwise
known as speckle-patterns. Works exceedingly well...
Atmospheric turbulence can be described by a Kolmogorov distribution,
or equivalently as a chaotic
Group,
I haven't been following this thread that won't die, but I've
contributed to others :^)
If the problem is that it is expensive to detect when a bullet
hits a target half a mile away, then have I got a solution for
you!
Visit any friendly neighborhood terrorist supply store and buy
a
: RE: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Group,
I haven't been following this thread that won't die, but I've
contributed to others :^)
If the problem is that it is expensive to detect when a bullet
hits a target half a mile away, then have I got a solution for
you!
Visit any
. Just don't drop it.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Hawkins [mailto:b...@iaxs.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:39 PM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Group,
I haven't been
a flash. Just don't drop it.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Hawkins [mailto:b...@iaxs.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:39 PM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Group,
I haven't been
time-nuts-boun...@febo.com wrote on 11/03/2010 05:55:16 PM:
From:
William H. Fite omni...@gmail.com
To:
Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Date:
11/03/2010 05:55 PM
Subject:
Re: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds
Hi
Roughly speaking, you know the distance to 0.1%. If the electronics are good to
0.01% they aren't going to contribute a significant amount of error. A fairly
modest bare crystal will do quite nicely for the time base. No need to go any
further. If you want to go time-nutty, put in a cell
@febo.com
Date:
11/03/2010 05:55 PM
Subject:
Re: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Sent by:
time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Nitrogen triiodide is safer, cheaper, and you can make it
yourself. Put on
the target wet, hang it while still wet, let it dry
of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Group,
I haven't been following this thread that won't die, but I've
contributed to others :^)
If the problem is that it is expensive to detect when a bullet
hits a target half
On 11/3/2010 5:40 PM, Bill Hawkins wrote:
Actually, some old dynamite that is leaking an oily liquid
is a sure-fire way to get a flash. Just don't drop it.
And be sure to wear gloves to prevent direct skin absorption of the
nitro
(usually not mentioned on the MSDS.)
Other wise you may
of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Why .30 cal holes can't be seen at 800 yds...
Group,
I haven't been following this thread that won't die, but I've
contributed to others :^)
If the problem is that it is expensive to detect when a bullet
hits a target half
Michael Conlen wrote:
There's always nitroglycerin. I've heard it reacts well to vibration.
nitromethane is much more readily available and also shock sensitive.
Cyanoacrylate debonder. or glowplug fuel
___
time-nuts mailing list --
20 matches
Mail list logo
