om [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of ewkeh...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 8:58 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] any HP 5370B Available or other TIC
Paul,
following all the responses to this posting I think a old fashioned D/M is
still the answer for
Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of ewkeh...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 8:58 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] any HP 5370B Available or other TIC
Paul,
following all the responses to this posting I think
Jergen, I am glad to release every thing, there are no secrets if there is
interest I will gladly send you and for that matter any one else interested
off line schematics and pictures. I do not want to flood the list since
there is only sparse interest also I am limited by the attachment size
Dear Bert,
Reading your description, did make me curious. I understand you don't
want release too much in order to avoid confusion in the future. But do
you have some more material you can share with us?
Thank you, best regards, Jeroen
On 08/19/2011 02:57 PM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:
Paul,
f
Paul,
following all the responses to this posting I think a old fashioned D/M is
still the answer for you. For years there have been discussions on using
latest technology but limited to discussion no hardware. Maybe now is the
time it will change.
That is why two years ago I set out do de
Thanks for the links, Javier!
Will have a look at it asap.
Regards,
Javier
El 19/08/2011 00:55, Javier Serrano escribió:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Bruce Griffiths<
bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
CERN make all the required DDMTD VHDL code freely available.
Voilà:
http://www
Hi,
El 19/08/2011 00:28, Tijd Dingen escribió:
Generally speaking, any ADC approach that uses /affordable/ ADC's (read: no GHz
sampling rates) will result in lower number of timestamps per second than with
the TDC in fpga approach.
I know, I know :) As I said, first I'm looking around the dif
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Bruce Griffiths <
bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
> CERN make all the required DDMTD VHDL code freely available.
>
>
Voilà:
http://www.ohwr.org/projects/wr-cores/repository/revisions/master/changes/modules/timing/dmtd_with_deglitcher.vhd
It is not terribly c
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Tijd Dingen wrote:
>
> I'm meeting timing in a 390 MHz design with 192 taps (admittedly after a
> quite a bit of messing with the tools to get P&R to do what I want). The
> pipeline obviously is more stages... But maybe you guys are doing something
> different. O
design headaches.
Anyways, just curious as to why the 125 MHz sampling rate.
regards,
Fred
From: Javier Serrano
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] any HP 5370B Available or o
olve problem once, instantiate many times
== multi-channel TDC for a nice price.
regards,
Fred
From: Javier Herrero
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] any HP 5370B Available or other TIC
El 18/08/2011 22:16,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Javier Herrero wrote:
>
> My main interest is a TIC with better resolution than a 5370 and also with
> higher data flow, or with the capabilities to do some post-processing of a
> bunch of data. Really it is an idea I've from long, but not yet though too
> serious
El 18/08/2011 22:16, Tijd Dingen escribió:
So while I am not directly looking to divide my tinkering time between this
project and yet another project, if what you plan to do in the fpga precision
timing realm coincides enough ... it might be useful to combine some things. At
the very least w
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] any HP 5370B Available or other TIC
El 18/08/2011 08:37, Bruce Griffiths escribió:
> DMTD or dual mixer time difference.
> An all digital version (DDMTD like that used
Javier Herrero wrote:
El 18/08/2011 08:37, Bruce Griffiths escribió:
DMTD or dual mixer time difference.
An all digital version (DDMTD like that used in CERN's White Rabbit)
is also possible
3 (and M) input versions are also feasible.
Either an FPGA or a CPD plus a microprocessor are required
El 18/08/2011 08:37, Bruce Griffiths escribió:
DMTD or dual mixer time difference.
An all digital version (DDMTD like that used in CERN's White Rabbit)
is also possible
3 (and M) input versions are also feasible.
Either an FPGA or a CPD plus a microprocessor are required to ensure
low cost.
time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Cianciolo
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:11 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] any HP 5370B Available or other TIC
Hello Folks,
I am looking for an instrument that is better than Fluke 103a comparator.
T
Paul Cianciolo wrote:
Hello Folks,
I am looking for an instrument that is better than Fluke 103a comparator.
The purpose of this piece of equipment is help me learn more about oscillators
and characterizing them
The HP5370B is the TIC I keep hearing about but I am not glued to that make or mo
On 18/08/11 05:10, Paul Cianciolo wrote:
Hello Folks,
I am looking for an instrument that is better than Fluke 103a comparator.
The purpose of this piece of equipment is help me learn more about oscillators
and characterizing them
The HP5370B is the TIC I keep hearing about but I am not glued t
Hello Folks,
I am looking for an instrument that is better than Fluke 103a comparator.
The purpose of this piece of equipment is help me learn more about oscillators
and characterizing them
The HP5370B is the TIC I keep hearing about but I am not glued to that make or
model.
I wou;d like to hea
20 matches
Mail list logo
