> > Oh for convenience. I need to patch ntpd to use linux pps (afaik) and on
> > other systems I successfully run gpsd with ntpd (read: low jitter).
>
> Using gpsd with ntpd reduces the jitter versus just using ntpd by itself?
No I meant that running that combination is successfully because I see
>
>
> One possibility is that the CPU is getting turned off when idle to save
> power. If that includes the stuff normally used for timekeeping, things
> could get screwed up when it gets turned back on. It has to reset the
> time, probably getting it from the RTC.
>
I don't think this is the ca
: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] looking for low-power system for gps ntp timekeeping
NANOSG20
> It is a garmin 18x lvc.
That's pretty vanilla. It really should work. I won't be surprised if the
NMEA is off by hundreds of ms and/or
> It is a garmin 18x lvc.
That's pretty vanilla. It really should work. I won't be surprised if the
NMEA is off by hundreds of ms and/or has 100 ms of wander, but the PPS should
work.
Would you please try ntpd's NMEA driver, preferably from the latest ntp-dev
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:14 PM, folkert wrote:
>
>
> Oh for convenience. I need to patch ntpd to use linux pps (afaik) and on
> other systems I successfully run gpsd with ntpd (read: low jitter).
Using gpsd with ntpd reduces the jitter versus just using ntpd by itself?
__
The computer itself and the NTP installation are OK because we can see it
syncing to other NTP servers. Likely you have a problem in the way the GPS
using is connected.
Some common errors is an inverted PPS, just flip it ad see if you gets
better, it is really hard to see a 1Hz signal on a scope.
> Thanks for your graphs, but what are the Y-axis units!
http://keetweej.vanheusden.com/~folkert/nanosg20.png is in ms and not
the delay, the offset instead.
> Inn your billboard above, the PPS looks to be on the wrong edge -
> perhaps the pulse is 250 ms wide and you are syncing to the trailing
> folk...@vanheusden.com said:
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
> ==
> x127.127.28.0.NMEA. 0 l3 16 3770.000 -994.05 7.857
> x127.127.28.1.PPS.
Hi,
I decided to buy a Nanos G20. Not too expensive, real serial port,
debian linux pre-installed.
I don't want to sound harsh as the people from Nanos probably did their
best to produce a good product, but for timekeeping it is totally crap
and also useless.
Well, unless I did something wrong.
I
folk...@vanheusden.com said:
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==
x127.127.28.0.NMEA. 0 l3 16 3770.000 -994.05 7.857
x127.127.28.1.PPS.
Hi,
I decided to buy a Nanos G20. Not too expensive, real serial port,
debian linux pre-installed.
I don't want to sound harsh as the people from Nanos probably did their
best to produce a good product, but for timekeeping it is totally crap
and also useless.
Well, unless I did something wrong.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
