Bill Beam said the following on 12/31/2005 11:45 PM:
I have since compared UT+ raw data with TAC32 display
as follows:
UT+ raw data TAC32 display
12/31/05 23:59:59 same
12/31/05 23:59:60 1/1/06 00:00:00
12/31/05 23:59:60 1/1/06 00:00:01
1/1/2006 00:00:00
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 08:55:19 -0500, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Bill Beam said the following on 12/31/2005 11:45 PM:
I have since compared UT+ raw data with TAC32 display
as follows:
UT+ raw data TAC32 display
12/31/05 23:59:59 same
12/31/05 23:59:60 1/1/06 00:00:00
TAC32 failed to display 23:59:60.
Within a few seconds (possibly/probably one second)
the TAC32 time display was correct.
The raw data stream from Motorola UT+ correctly
showed 23:59:60 as the last second of 2005.
TAC32 queries the UT+ for UTC-GPS offset at 20sec
after each minute and at
I have since compared UT+ raw data with TAC32 display
as follows:
UT+ raw data TAC32 display
12/31/05 23:59:59 same
12/31/05 23:59:60 1/1/06 00:00:00
12/31/05 23:59:60 1/1/06 00:00:01
1/1/2006 00:00:00 1/1/06 00:00:01
1/1/2006 00:00:01 same
I assume the UT+ raw
