, but it looks like a list of
numbers folllows this, and not the letter A I'm converned this is
perhaps a special, at an odd freqency, and not the standard 10MHz
10811A. Is there any where it actually says 10811A on the
package? Can you give me a price to ship to the UK. Address would
Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK) wrote:
All 10811-6 are simply selections of one of the above.
After a lot of time has gone by, these selections are, for the
most part, irrelevant.
The specs on the 10811A are higher than on the 10811-60111. If I
remember correctly, there are no phase noise
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Kirkby writes:
I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that there would be a higher probability
of a randomly chosen 10811A being better today than a randomly chosen
10811-60111. I guess the only way to know this is to test a sufficient
number to get statically
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Kirkby writes:
I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that there would be a higher probability
of a randomly chosen 10811A being better today than a randomly chosen
10811-60111. I guess the only way to know this is to test a sufficient
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Kirkby writes:
I seriously doubt you will ever get a better and more researched
answer than:
Tom has said he has tested bad 10811A's and good 10811-60111's.
But Tom has not said (to me anyway) if the peformance of the oscillators
tested is randomly
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Kirkby writes:
I seriously doubt you will ever get a better and more researched
answer than:
Tom has said he has tested bad 10811A's and good 10811-60111's.
But Tom has not said (to me anyway) if the peformance of the oscillators
Folks, I hesitate to do this, but I think this topic has gone on long
enough and we're not shedding much new light. Let's give it a rest
Thanks,
John
Yr Humble Listmanager
___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
David,
It is understandable that you are disappointed that it turns out this
seller is offering the 10811 - 60111 version instead of the 10811 A model that
you were looking for. But if you look at your question to him objectively, I
think one can reasonably see that he took your
Joe Geller wrote:
David,
It is understandable that you are disappointed that it turns out this seller is offering the 10811 - 60111 version instead of the 10811 A model that you were looking for. But if you look at your question to him objectively, I think one can reasonably see that he took
David Kirkby wrote:
Feel free to continue to discuss it privately with me if you wish. I
have set the reply address to myself only.
I did change the reply to address, but the mailing list has changed
the reply to adress once again. One obviously can't override that
process.
--
David Kirkby,
I appreciate the notification of somebody who does not deliver what was
advertised. There is too much spin doctoring going on.
Joe Geller wrote:
David,
It is understandable that you are disappointed that it turns out this seller is offering the 10811 - 60111 version instead of the 10811 A
11 matches
Mail list logo