Hi Fred,
On 05/15/2011 10:55 PM, Tijd Dingen wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Magnus Danielson wrote:
Well, you always have the corner-case where numerical precision and near
same frequency beating comes into play, so what will help and what will
reduce your precision becomes a little fuzzy to say in gene
Hi Magnus,
Magnus Danielson wrote:
>>> There are many things you can get away with, just how much trouble you
>>> want to verify it versus doing the proper thing is another issue.
>> Define "proper thing". ;-) From what I understand taking the exact Nth edge,
>> and then do linear regression is e
Hi Fred,
On 05/14/2011 03:42 PM, Tijd Dingen wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
There are many things you can get away with, just how much trouble you
want to verify it versus doing the proper thing is another issue.
Define "proper thing". ;-) From what I understand taking the exact Nth edge,
an
Magnus Danielson wrote:
> There are many things you can get away with, just how much trouble you
> want to verify it versus doing the proper thing is another issue.
Define "proper thing". ;-) From what I understand taking the exact Nth edge,
and then do linear regression is equivalent to taking
Hi Fred,
On 05/14/2011 12:12 PM, Tijd Dingen wrote:
Thanks for the sanity check! :)
I was indeed hoping to be able to get away with "not every Nth edge" since that
simplifies thing.
There are many things you can get away with, just how much trouble you
want to verify it versus doing the pro
for
this particular applicaction?
regards,
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Magnus Danielson
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Continuous timestamping reciprocal counter question
On 05/13/2011 04:56 PM, Tijd Dingen wrote:
> To
On 05/13/2011 04:56 PM, Tijd Dingen wrote:
To calculate the frequency from these time stamps you have to do some slop
fitting. If you use a least squares matrix approach for that I could see how
the more random distribution could help prevent singularities.
The only reason I can see now to rea
ble to spit out a timestamp
for exactly every Nth cycle.
Thanks!
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Bob Camp
To: 'Tijd Dingen' ; time-nuts@febo.com
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:26 PM
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Continuous timestamping reciprocal counter question
Hi
Comp
ssive bandwidth" in all caps.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Tijd Dingen [mailto:tijddin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 12:22 PM
To: Bob Camp; time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Continuous timestamping reciprocal counter question
Now it is my turn for an "it depen
om: Bob Camp
To: 'Tijd Dingen'
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:02 PM
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Continuous timestamping reciprocal counter question
Hi
The exactly every Nth cycle thing makes the math easy. Easy math means I can
do lots of samples. Lots of samples means better regress
10 matches
Mail list logo
