Another option would be a Meinberg NTP appliance.
https://www.meinbergglobal.com/
I have implemented a couple (for geographically dispersed data centres) of the
Meinberg LANtime M300 about 10'years back. They still run without a hitch, and
have done so without ever failing. "Ours" are dual radi
Hi
I would strongly suggest that with NTP “more is better”. Three reference devices
is about the minimum. Five is a good target to aim for. Each approach to a
device
has its weak points (cost may be one of them). In a “get what you pay for”
world,
having a couple of “real” commercial boxes in th
Hello all —
I am working on several broadcast radio projects that require a local PTP
server at multiple locations. The purpose of PTP in this context is to
timestamp audio and related control data. The timestamps ensure proper
reassembly at distant locations after transfer over public/priva
kb...@n1k.org said:
> I would strongly suggest that with NTP ???more is better???. Three reference
> devices is about the minimum. Five is a good target to aim for.
I think it's more complicated than that. Quality over quantity.
Using more servers does give you a better chance at getting a good
kb...@n1k.org said:
I would strongly suggest that with NTP ???more is better???. Three reference
devices is about the minimum. Five is a good target to aim for.
One suggestion I make to folk who ask is to use the "pool" directive. This
allows NTP to choose as many servers as it needs (accord
On 25/11/2021 08:14, Hal Murray wrote:
(according to a pre-configured compile-time constant),
Have you looked at the tinker stuff in the config file? I'd expect it to be
there.
I don't see it in there, Hal.
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software for you
Web: https://www.satsignal
