Re: [time-nuts] uBlox F9P versus F9T

2019-07-18 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi The price of a bare module is still a bit steep. The price of the uBlox board for the F9P still looks like a steal though ….. At this point you still don’t seem to be able to buy F9T modules through distribution at all. Both are priced just below $200 on the uBlox site. The F9P is priced i

Re: [time-nuts] uBlox F9P versus F9T

2019-07-18 Thread Glen English VK1XX
fine business. thanks for the insight. The dual band L1, L2 is a certain plus. At a price Hard to ignore the benefits certainly for apps that can afford it. I'll report back... cheers On 18/07/2019 7:37 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote: Hi Having played with both, there are differences in how the P a

Re: [time-nuts] uBlox F9P versus F9T

2019-07-17 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi Having played with both, there are differences in how the P and the T do things. Both do a better job on timing than single band modules do. The T has multiple pps outputs and *should* handle logging (at a fairly coarse resolution) an input pps on two inputs. Both will handle external cor

[time-nuts] uBlox F9P versus F9T

2019-07-17 Thread Glen English VK1XX
The F9T and F9P - are these interchangeable for stationary timing use and stationary high performance position ? From how I read the datasheets, : >>the F9P has an internal RTK engine, and the F9T outputs the info RTCM etc and that data can be run on a external RTK engine on a micro. The P p