On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:42:37PM +0200, Claudio Bley wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I just pushed a new change to the mob branch
> (http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git/commit/433ecdfc9d1402ecf03e710de481e2063ad6de90)
> adding support for C99 for loops a few hours ago.
>
> A simple test program works as expected:
Le mercredi 23 juin 2010 15:28:09, grischka a écrit :
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> >> What was the problem with using just conftest.x as suggested?
> >
> > Compared to the $RANDOM approach this solution is far less random.
>
> And what is the problem with less random?
I don't know but I thought
Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
What was the problem with using just conftest.x as suggested?
Compared to the $RANDOM approach this solution is far less random.
And what is the problem with less random?
Otherwise I'd suggest to waste time with more useful things, such as
a rewrite of tccgen.c or of
Le mercredi 23 juin 2010 12:45:15, grischka a écrit :
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > I finally replace the mechanism in place by mktemp which is part of the
> > MSYS collection of tools.
>
> It does not seem part of what I have because now ./configure erased
> all files in my tinycc folder.
And t
Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
I finally replace the mechanism in place by mktemp which is part of the MSYS
collection of tools.
It does not seem part of what I have because now ./configure erased
all files in my tinycc folder.
What was the problem with using just conftest.x as suggested?
--- gri
