Hi.
> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:35:16 -0800 (PST)
> From: Rick Hodgin
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] i just can't get over how farging fast tcc is...
> To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
>
> Stephan,
>
> Bear in mind that while the compile time is fast, and the executable code
> is small and tight, the ex
Hello,
I want to add stabs type info to all kinds of variables.
I'm reading http://www.math.utah.edu/docs/info/stabs_2.html as
documentation. Where do I have to touch tcc code to make sure I'm not
leaving anything out?
Regards,
Simon Lehmayr
___
Ti
search for git tinycc and download the latest mob version. (A bit risky
so).
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Hi, all!
i'm trying something very simple:
stephan@ludo:~/cvs/fossil/cpdo$ tcc -fPIC -c -DCPDO_ENABLE_SQLITE3=1
-DCPDO_ENABLE_MYSQL5=1 -I. -I./include cpdo_amalgamation.c
stephan@ludo:~/cvs/fossil/cpdo$ tcc -c -I. -Iinclude test.c
stephan@ludo:~/cvs/fossil/cpdo$ tcc -o test-tcc -rdynamic -L/us
The same curious can compare performances (expressed in second) between gcc
and tcc (both 32/64 bits) on the same Windows 7 x64 machine.
While LAP compiled code (interpreted by a virtual machine) is generally
twice as fast as the interpreter, tcc is two times slower.
GNU GCC 4.5 (Mgw) XP (Com
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Gary Birkett wrote:
> I am already impressed with its reported build speed, though I am curious
> at just how much of a difference the optimisation steps in gcc actually
> make.
> I would test myself, but most of the things I build are for ARM, hence my
> asking y
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Gary Birkett wrote:
>
>> Why not test it? :)
>>
>>
Okay, since i was provoked ;)...
Here's a test which connects to a mysql db, creates a small table, puts a
few records in it, and performs some sanity checks
For the curious:
I have been compiling several of my projects with both tcc and gcc for
awhile now. Specifically, I've been compiling an ANTLR C project that
consist of about 60,000 lines of ANLTR generated code that translates
another language to C. As you would expect, the compilation with tcc
Le mercredi 02 février 2011 03:35:16, Rick Hodgin a écrit :
> Stephan,
>
> Bear in mind that while the compile time is fast, and the executable code
> is small and tight, the execution times may still be notably slower as
> there aren't optimizations like gcc has.
Except that optimization was turn
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Gary Birkett wrote:
>
>> :)
>>
>>
>> Why not test it? :)
>>
>
> The milliseconds won't matter for what i'm doing - the database access
> times swamp any overhead introduced by a non-optimizing compiler.
>
> :)
10 matches
Mail list logo
