For me, the biggest draw that keeps me coming back and using TCC is
that the code is simplified with only what is needed to compile the
code. It's specifically the _lack_ of features that makes TCC a daily
driver for me on the unusual platforms/uses I use it with. I know it
may sound silly, but I
On 2024-05-12 07:20:13 +, avih via Tinycc-devel wrote:
> Personally I don't think this is required, but I don't pretend to
> represent the tinycc maintainers' opinion. If it is added, however,
> then the following should probably be taken into account:
>
> - This mostly works, but it won't wo
Дана 24/05/12 09:27AM, gz8...@0w.se написа:
> Also, adding code to tinycc which is not related to its function as a
> compiler, even if this potentially improves its quality as a development
> environment, contradicts unfortunately the "tiny" quality. The added
> bytes never go away.
I second this
Personally I don't think this is required, but I don't pretend to
represent the tinycc maintainers' opinion. If it is added, however,
then the following should probably be taken into account:
- This mostly works, but it won't work on all terminals, for instance
the original DEC VT100 has bold bu
