Дана 24/05/12 09:27AM, gz8...@0w.se написа:
> Also, adding code to tinycc which is not related to its function as a
> compiler, even if this potentially improves its quality as a development
> environment, contradicts unfortunately the "tiny" quality. The added
> bytes never go away.

I second this. The idea of tinycc is that it should be a minimal, fast,  
working C compiler without any unnecessary bloat.

Taking suckless software as an example, coloring could be added to 
tinycc in the form of a patch. In that case, to enable coloring a user 
would apply a patch supporting color output before compiling tinycc.

_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to