For me, the biggest draw that keeps me coming back and using TCC is
that the code is simplified with only what is needed to compile the
code. It's specifically the _lack_ of features that makes TCC a daily
driver for me on the unusual platforms/uses I use it with. I know it
may sound silly, but I
I have been maintaining this
https://github.com/cnlohr/tinycc-win64-installer and get 3-4
downloads/week. Whenever we have a new release, I do plan to build an
installer for Windows for it as well. Did I miss a release?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 8:34 AM John Mastronardo via Tinycc-devel
wrote:
>
That seems like a heavier hammer than just keeping everything the same but
overriding the symbols / wrapping them for your project? Why not just keep
the symbol names as they are, but wrap them separately, using compiler
flags/#define's? I haven't wrapped stuff in a while so maybe I'm missing
som
TIL it's not always "-I" ... I feel like it should always be -I.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 7:41 AM certanan via Tinycc-devel <
tinycc-devel@nongnu.org> wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> I have finally got around to having a shot at implementing C23's "#embed"
> directive. However, I am struggling to thi
I have used TCC in many personal and professional projects, and it has
been invaluable in my professional career as well in my hobbies. Not a week
goes by without half a dozen invocations of TinyCC in my life.
Individuals I introduce to my build environment come away pleasantly
surprised that for
(The above are all language-based features; there's library features
>> too such as the new stdbit.h header, improved time bases in time.h, the new
>> stdckdint.h header for overflow/underflow-checked arithmetic, and more.)
>>
>> I'd like to know what thi
Sorry, I inadvertently replied to this thread instead of the main thread.
I will move my reply there.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:53 PM Charles Lohr wrote:
> My suggestion is if possible someone from our group/view should try to
> apply whatever means we can to keep C clean, clear and sim
My suggestion is if possible someone from our group/view should try to
apply whatever means we can to keep C clean, clear and simple to implement
the standard, allowing the people who feel the drive to "improve things" to
direct that at a different language standard, or an offshoot of some sort.
I
I was just wondering if anyone from TCC on the standards committee? I just
really hope for a compiler as popular as TCC, there's someone there
defending the interests of all the not-GCC, not-clang compilers, where
difficulty of feature addition is a paramount concern. I use TCC as my
daily driver
A few days ago, I started experimenting with just using NSIS to package up
TinyCC as an installer for Windows, which worked out well. It basically:
* Includes TinyCC Win-64 0.9.27 (Boy would a new release be nice!)
* Includes Win API Headers Full
* Optionally adds TCC (wherever it is installed)
Milosavljevic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:36:06 -0400
> Charles Lohr wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know the status of these risc-v commits? I'm going to soon
> need
> > the risc-v portion of tcc.
>
> As usual, I've posted those patches to the mailin
Does anyone know the status of these risc-v commits? I'm going to soon need
the risc-v portion of tcc.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, 09:06 Danny Milosavljevic
wrote:
> ---
> riscv64-asm.c | 11 +--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/riscv64-asm.c b/riscv64-asm.c
>
I am interested in doing a project using TinyCC, a web-based IDE for the
ESP32-C3, a wifi-enabled microcontroller.
https://github.com/cnlohr/espwebc3/blob/main/README.md
I spent a while trying to decipher riscv-gen, and it's actually not that
bad. Very much inline with the cryptic TinyCC (ok, bit
I tried creating a TinyCC target for asm.js and never really found a clean
way to do it because of lack of goto. My goal was to build an in-browser
compiler for cheap wifi microcontrollers, the ESP8266 which could let you
write code, compile it and run it without the need for a development system
I've been spending the last 8 months or so working on a weird game engine
that revolves around TCC. I don't have any specific requests, or anything
else but wanted to thank everyone here for all the work you've put into
TCC. TCC's portability, size and speed has allowed me to explore and push
the
I have personally also been frustrated by the TCC repo's reliability as
well. I haven't done a deep clone of TinyCC in a while, so all my stuff is
either out-of-date or shallow. Does anyone know who owns the github
mirror? Possibly they could push a more up-to-date mob to it?
https://github.com/T
Is there a reason you don't just compile tcc in tcc to make the tcc
instance that is basically then reentrant? I've used this trick a while on
things other than tcc, turning all global or static variables in any C
program into an object that can be created or deleted or duplicated in a
process spa
; {
>
> -int f = vtop[0].type.t;
>
> +int f = vtop[0].type.t & VT_BTYPE;
>
> +
>
> assert(t == VT_FLOAT || t == VT_DOUBLE || t == VT_LDOUBLE);
>
> assert(f == VT_FLOAT || f == VT_DOUBLE || f == VT_LDOUBLE);
>
> if (t == f)
>
>
>
>
>
>
Using default settings, in hash 96f1fb1, current mob head, I am having an
internal compiler assert on arm64. The following program causes an
assert. There are other cases but the assert remains the same.
float fd;
int main()
{
if( fd < 5.5 ) return 1;
return 0;
}
root@omitted:~/
Anyone know how long the outage on https://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc is going to
be? I never realized how dependent I was on remote git trees being up.
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
I echo Christian Jullien's request for adding to the RELICENSING file.
It's of value to me that it would work out to be clearly MIT licensed.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 1:06 AM Christian Jullien wrote:
> Many thanks for your explanation. If it's the case, I suffices.
>
> C.
>
> -Original Message
I've been trying to find a way out of this for a bit now. I'd like to
carry over some optimizations to a TCC host compile, but, I'm stuck with
using pthread_key_create and friends. This is a bit of an annoying
solution and not optimal... And potentially even rougher on Windows.
It looks like all
This really interests me as well. I still am working on my
tinycc-to-javascript environment, and to support "goto" was quite awkward
and required wrapping all code in functions inside "switch" statements. I
was hoping webassembly would accept the request to have a "goto" but as far
as I understan
Just wondering, is there any codified "this is our preferred coding
standards" regarding curly-brace, tabs/spaces, commets, etc.?
I'm normally a:
if( ( condition ) || ( 3 & 5 ) ) {
[TAB]Stuff
} else {
[TAB]Other stuff //Comment
}
kinda guy, but seems like this is inconsistently in direct oppositi
In trying to write a target for TinyCC, I've noticed the rest of the engine
seems to want to do a fair bit of register/stack management. This is fine
and dandy, but I am having a lot of difficulty understanding where the line
between my target and the TCC register functions such as get_reg, gv, gv
I am interested in making a full in-browser IDE for the ESP8266. Or, just
making a compiler that's reasonable to install on a variety of systems.
Right now, it's a complete mess. To do this, I need to port TCC to xtensa
specifically lx6 with no floating point. I've started down this path but
hav
or the new warning regarding
> __declspec(dllimport/export)! Very much appreciated. Do any of you live
> in Australia? I'll send you some PREFERRED_DELICACY. )
>
>
>
> Charles Lohr wrote:
>
> I've been lurking here and there, but haven't seen any rabbling abo
I've been lurking here and there, but haven't seen any rabbling about a new
release? It's been several years and I really like the current mainline
for my projects. I'm hoping to use TCC in a rash of upcoming projects.
Any word if I might be able to direct people to 0.9.27?
The latest I can see
[I sent this earlier but it doesn't seem to have been accepted to the list,
but it was before I was properly signed up]
I've found only small bits and pieces of information about how to do this
strewn across the internet. Hopefully this message will have enough
keywords in it that others will fin
I've found only small bits and pieces of information about how to do this
strewn across the internet. Hopefully this message will have enough
keywords in it that others will find it... and hopefully someone on the
list will be able to help.
I've tried pulling some files from the current developme
30 matches
Mail list logo
