Hi,
The behavior on the following program is incorrect with Debian's
tcc (at least up to 0.9.26~git20120612.ad5f375-3) on x86_64
(64-bit ABI).
#include
#define M1 (1 << (int) 1)
#define M2 (1 << (unsigned int) 1)
#define M3 (1 << (long) 1)
#define M4 (1 << (unsigned long) 1)
#define M5 (1 << (l
On 2012-06-26 15:07:57 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> ISO C99 TC3 says: [6.5.7#3] "The integer promotions are performed on
> each of the operands. The type of the result is that of the promoted
> left operand."
I've written a patch (attached). Now the shift problems no longer
occur with the testc
The patch looks good to me. I also did some basic tests, and the patch did
not seem to break anything. I assumed you wanted it commited, so I did that
in your name.
Miki.
On 27 June 2012 07:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 15:07:57 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > ISO C99 TC3 says:
Le mercredi 27 juin 2012 14:34:25, Milutin Jovanović a écrit :
> The patch looks good to me. I also did some basic tests, and the patch did
> not seem to break anything. I assumed you wanted it commited, so I did that
> in your name.
You overtook me ;) It looks good to me and I was upgrading my i3
On 2012-06-27 14:38:44 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 juin 2012 14:34:25, Milutin Jovanović a écrit :
> > The patch looks good to me. I also did some basic tests, and the patch did
> > not seem to break anything. I assumed you wanted it commited, so I did that
> > in your name.
>
Vincent,
Would you mind adding your test into the test "suite". Pick tests or tests2
which ever you find easier to add to. I hope it will take only minutes
since you already have them written.
Miki.
On 27 June 2012 12:57, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-06-27 14:38:44 +0200, Thomas Preud'ho
Hi,
On 2012-06-27 15:02:20 -0400, Milutin Jovanović wrote:
> Would you mind adding your test into the test "suite". Pick tests or tests2
> which ever you find easier to add to. I hope it will take only minutes
> since you already have them written.
I've rewritten my tests to be added to the test
On 2012-07-06 13:33:23 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I've rewritten my tests to be added to the test suite and improved
> them. They show that my patch was actually incorrect when the
> first argument is unsigned short: the type should by int, not
> unsigned int. This needs to be fixed...
Fixed
Le vendredi 6 juillet 2012 14:25:54, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> On 2012-07-06 13:33:23 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I've rewritten my tests to be added to the test suite and improved
> > them. They show that my patch was actually incorrect when the
> > first argument is unsigned short: the ty
