grischka wrote:
> From: "KHMan":
> [snip snip]
>> As for changesets, my plan is to name them using the revision
>> numbers, like "cvs395.diff". I will keep a set of hg exports, like
>> "hg395.diff". This is to preserve commit order.
>
> Hm, I don't understand exactly. Why do we need two sets of f
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:31:23AM -0600, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> On 11/2/07, KHMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > grischka wrote:
> > > Do you think it is possible and/or makes sense to extract all
> > > changesets from Rob's repo into single patches first, with an
> > > automatic script or someth
On 11/2/07, KHMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> grischka wrote:
> > Do you think it is possible and/or makes sense to extract all
> > changesets from Rob's repo into single patches first, with an
> > automatic script or something?
In case you're not aware of it, check out Mercurial Queues
(http://h
From: "KHMan":
> However I think some of David Dodge's patches have already been
> applied, and bits of documentation has been updated in CVS, so I
> guess that some hg patches will not apply cleanly.
Yes, might happen, but we can deal with technical questions later.
> I am doing this
> on cygw
grischka wrote:
> From: "KHMan":
>> I will push patches to grischka, and check every few patches with
>> Ubuntu "make all", and the two trees should come together.
>
> Do you think it is possible and/or makes sense to extract all
> changesets from Rob's repo into single patches first, with an
>
From: "KHMan":
> I will push patches to grischka, and check every few patches with
> Ubuntu "make all", and the two trees should come together.
Do you think it is possible and/or makes sense to extract all
changesets from Rob's repo into single patches first, with an
automatic script or somethi
grischka wrote:
> From: "KHMan"
>> Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository.
>
> Thanks Mr. KHMan.
> I have committed this patch together with a Changelog entry to
> the TinyCC CVS at Savannah.
Oh, okay, I just checked the Savannah page and I won't bother
David Wheeler an
From: "KHMan"
> Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository.
Thanks Mr. KHMan.
I have committed this patch together with a Changelog entry to
the TinyCC CVS at Savannah.
Please go on :)
--- grischka
___
Tinycc-devel mailing lis
Dave Dodge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:59:15AM +0800, KHMan wrote:
>> Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository. I
>> assume revisions up to 395 is already in the official CVS,
>
> Just a quick note about mercurial: revision numbers such as 395 are
> just a convenience a
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:59:15AM +0800, KHMan wrote:
> Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository. I
> assume revisions up to 395 is already in the official CVS,
Just a quick note about mercurial: revision numbers such as 395 are
just a convenience and are locally assigned to e
Hi all,
Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository. I
assume revisions up to 395 is already in the official CVS, so
perhaps I shall try and see how many trivial patches I can make
from revision 396 onwards, versus current Savannah CVS. No quality
assurance beyond trying a "make a
11 matches
Mail list logo
