Dave Dodge wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:59:15AM +0800, KHMan wrote: >> Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository. I >> assume revisions up to 395 is already in the official CVS, > > Just a quick note about mercurial: revision numbers such as 395 are > just a convenience and are locally assigned to each copy of the > repository. They aren't guaranteed to be the same for each user; in > fact local commits will quickly knock them out of sync. Changeset IDs > such as f357b2f8add5 _are_ kept globally consistent, so if you want to > specify a particular change you can use those.
Thanks, I understand, I know some git and I am reading hgbook now. It was just more convenient with those numbers assuming Seo's Mercurial bundle is a frozen unit. I guess hg/git people can correctly say that my brain has been lobotomized by the notion of SVN revision numbers... :-) I will be contacting David Wheeler to see if he is interested in accepting them patches. -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
