On 7/6/07, Zhifeng Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear David,
Thanks for your reply!
With regard to the second question, if we disallow programmers to use
assembly code and assume ncc can perform global and inter-procedural alias
analysis, can we safely conclude my aforementioned claim
On 7/9/07, David Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/07, Zhifeng Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear David,
Thanks for your reply!
With regard to the second question, if we disallow programmers to use
assembly code and assume ncc can perform global and inter-procedural alias
analysis, can
: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 12:29 AM
To: Zhifeng Lai
Cc: tinyos help; Philip Levis; Zhifeng Lai
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Some confusion on the classic nesC paper.
On 7/9/07, David Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/07, Zhifeng Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear David,
Thanks for your reply
On 7/9/07, Zhifeng Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear David,
I do not have the background on developing embedded systems; I started to
learn nesC half a year ago for research purpose.
Do you mean that some commands in avr library that manipulate memory-mapped
I/O will enable interrupts as a
]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:23 AM
To: Zhifeng Lai
Cc: tinyos help; Philip Levis; Zhifeng Lai
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Some confusion on the classic nesC paper.
On 7/9/07, Zhifeng Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear David,
I do not have the background on developing embedded systems; I
; Zhifeng Lai
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Some confusion on the classic nesC paper.
On 7/4/07, Zhifeng Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Philip,
(1) Yes, I see. Another question relates to this: you said that the call
graph of nesC code is fully known at compile-time. I conjecture that the
component
On 7/4/07, Zhifeng Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Philip,
(1) Yes, I see. Another question relates to this: you said that the call
graph of nesC code is fully known at compile-time. I conjecture that the
component diagrams can be treated as call graphs in programming literature,
and since
On Jul 4, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Zhifeng Lai wrote:
Dear all,
I have some confusion on David and Philip’s PLDI paper, “The nesC
Language: A Holistic Approach to Networked Embedded Systems”:
(1) What is the exact meaning of “whole program analysis”? Does
it mean the compiler can take all
data races if they obey the
race-free invariant?
Best regards,
Yours,
Zhifeng Lai
-Original Message-
From: Philip Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:11 AM
To: Zhifeng Lai
Cc: 'tinyos help'; 'Zhifeng Lai'
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Some confusion on the classic
