[tipc-discussion] [PATCH net 1/1] tipc: resolve connection flow control compatibility problem

2016-11-24 Thread Jon Maloy
In commit 10724cc7bb78 ("tipc: redesign connection-level flow control") we replaced the previous message based flow control with one based on 1k blocks. In order to ensure backwards compatibility the mechanism falls back to using message as base unit when it senses that the peer doesn't support the

Re: [tipc-discussion] v4.7: soft lockup when releasing a socket

2016-11-24 Thread John Thompson
Hi Partha, I rebuilt afresh and retried the test with the same lockup kernel dumps. Yes I have multiple tipc clients subscribed to the topology server, at least 10 clients. They all use a subscription timeout of TIPC_WAIT_FOREVER I will try the kernel command line parameter next week. JT On Fri

Re: [tipc-discussion] TIPC link statistic

2016-11-24 Thread Jon Maloy
> -Original Message- > From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] > Sent: Thursday, 24 November, 2016 09:48 > To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [tipc-discussion] TIPC link statistic > > Hi all, > I got a basic question to the link statistic printed out from T

[tipc-discussion] TIPC link statistic

2016-11-24 Thread Holger Brunck
Hi all, I got a basic question to the link statistic printed out from TIPC when I use "tipc-config -ls" or "tipc link stat show". I got a link between a PPC board running kernel 4.4 and my local x86 PC via ethernet bearers. I have a simple server running on my PPC board listening on a TIPC socket

Re: [tipc-discussion] v4.7: soft lockup when releasing a socket

2016-11-24 Thread Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
Hi John, Do you have several tipc clients subscribed to topology server? What subscription timeout do they use? Please enable kernel command line parameter: softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace=1 /Partha On 11/23/2016 11:04 PM, John Thompson wrote: > Hi Partha, > > I tested overnight with the 2 patches