On 28 November Stephen Black wrote:
Young Dr. Freud, which I caught on PBS (US TV)
last night thanks to the alert by Charles Harris is, as
predicted by Charles, the standard admiring view as
seen through the eyes of uncritical supporters. It
offers no unpleasantness, no doubts, no dissenting
I had mentioned that the above TV programme had opened with a quote
from Freud to the effect that he had invented a new scientific method
for studying the mind. I sneered. On the contrary, I said,
Percival Bailey had an old paper in which he claimed that Freud's
scientific period ended in
Given all the recent posts on this, thought some might be interested
in the article out of the Guardian today:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,850321,00.html
Enviros Claim Attacks On Over 30 SUVs In Richmond, VA
The Guardian - UK 11-29-2
No vehicle in the United States provokes
I'm sorry, but you will learn best if you do your own work.
Here are some questions I might ask myself in thinking through such a problem:
1. Why do you want to compare the data? What are you trying to learn about the data?
2. How do you make your comparison "fair"? What would be the impact of
Just saw Young Dr. Freud on PBS and it's very well done. As PBS repeats
their specials often, it may be shown frequently in the near future. My
area schedule shows that it will be shown again at these times:
Saturday, November 30, 4am, WGBH 2
Sunday, December 1, 10:30pm, WGBH 44
Monday,
