The fact that two of Darwin's books, including the Origin of Species,
made the honorable mention list should tell us something about the
credibility of the think tank reviewers. ...Scott
Christopher D. Green wrote:
How about a list of the ten most harmful books (and a
bunch of honorable
Christina Hoff Summers isat it again:
This time putting therapy in her sights. Here's the review of her new
book, One Nation Under Therapy: How the Helping Culture is Eroding
Self-Reliance, from the New York Times.
Beth Benoit
Granite State College
May 1, 2005
In the interests of full disclosure, I should reveal that I'm personal
friends with Sally Satel. That issue aside, I'd strongly recommend this
highy provocative book, the NY Times review below (which I think misses
the point in several respects) notwithstanding. Whether one agrees with
most of
On 2 Jun 2005, Beth Benoit wrote:
Christina Hoff Summers is at it again: This time putting therapy
in her sights. Here's the review of her new book, One Nation
Under Therapy: How the Helping Culture is Eroding Self-Reliance,
from the New York Times.
Alas, Beth's alert includes a rather
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Scott Lilienfeld went:
The fact that two of Darwin's books, including the Origin of
Species, made the honorable mention list should tell us something
about the credibility of the think tank reviewers. ...Scott
An acquaintance of mine has pointed out that the list refers
Scott Lilienfeld wrote:
The book is less of a critique about psychotherapy per se (which
Sommer and Satel agree can be helpful in many cases), but what they term
therapism, viz., the increasingly widespread notion in popular culture
that most people are fragile and vulnerable to breakdown and
Tipsters: I have a question. What is social therapy and how does it differ
from other therapies? Thanks, Mike Lavin
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ruth: Very good questions.
I'm not aware of much survey data (which I suspect we'd need) to address
the question of how widespread this general belief is. I would certainly
say, however, that it seems to be quite widespread in much of the
popular psychology community. Witness, for
Michael: Social Therapy is actually a well known cult rather than a
legitimate form of therapy. See, for example, the following article for
a discussion:
http://www.rickross.com/reference/new_alliance/new_alliance25.html
Scott
Michael Lavin wrote:
Tipsters: I have a question. What is
- Original Message -
Subject: RE: A plea to post in plain text (was Re: tips digest: May 31,
2005
From: Rick Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:04:56 -0400
X-Message-Number: 2
Mike, you make some good points--but the problem is you're asking everyone
to stick to
I suspect that I would agree with the _NY Times Review_. But I'm
unlikely ever to find out, because I ran out of uses for Sally Satel
the day I read the _Wall Street Journal_ op-ed piece in which she
rails against harm reduction:
http://www.sallysatelmd.com/html/a-wsj08.html
No thanks.
Michael Lavin wrote:
Tipsters: I have a question. What is social therapy and how does it differ from
other therapies? Thanks, Mike Lavin
It's when you have therapy with friends mainly for recreational pruposes.
Sorry, I couldnt' resist.
Chris
--
Christopher D. Green
Department of
Folks, I have been doing a little detective work examining social therapy
and have received some documented evidence indicating that it might be a
cult therapy. Does anybody else have any comments on social therapy and
the possibility that it might have cult-like agenda?. I have a persona;
13 matches
Mail list logo
