My small effort to dispel the phenomenon named in the headline...
http://www.cbc.ca/story/business/national/2006/06/27/energy.html
--
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada
416-736-5115 ex. 66164
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.yorku.ca/christo
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:17:40 -0700, Michael Sylvester wrote:
we may as well place doubt on whether cognitive processes
are data.
Are you turning behaviorist on us Michael? I'm sure that there
are still enough hardcore behaviorists around that would argue
that non-observable cognitive processes
Hi Mike: Two points of friendly dissent.
(1) First, I don't really know what you mean when you say that self-report
tends to be unreliable. For one thing, psychometricians recognize that
there are at least three classical ways of operationalizing reliability
(internal consistency,
Hi all,
I will be teaching a five-week course this summer on Group Dynamics. I have never taught the course before and was wondering if any of you have taught the course, then maybe you could give me some ideas for group discussions or activities to do during class. This course is a four-hour
Yeahbbut --I still see the replies
Sigh.
This "Science is just
anotherreligion" tripe is starting to bug me. Enough people have
written about it and addressed it that one would think it would have trickled
all the way down, and we wouldn't be seeing it anymore.
The statement "Science
First my credentials: I'm not a smoker and have little regard for this
loathsome habit. I've
paid no attention to the second-hand smoke debate, although I rejoice in the
new law which
just came into effect in Quebec to ban smoking in restaurants and other public
places.
Yet I assume that
CALL FOR PROPOSALS for the 5th SPSP Teaching Preconference Memphis, TN,
January 25th, 2007
Join Keynote Speaker David Buss- Teaching about Evolutionary Psychology:
What's Hot.
Submissions of 30-50 minute presentations relating to teaching in
general and social and personality in particular are
Title: [tips] Re: if hallucinations are not
data.
At 10:38 AM -0400 6/28/06, Scott Lilienfeld wrote:
(2) Second, and perhaps Chris Green or
other TIPS historians can weigh in on this, I believe that you're
using the term methodological behaviorism incorrectly or
at least in a different way
Nothing much below re psychology- nor should most of it be taken at all
seriously!
Well. Is this what some conservatives really fear? That we'll be held economic
hostage by our benign Canadian neighbors? I hear the senarios coming. The
Canadians are causing global warming (opps! I mean climate
On Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:38 AM, Scott Lilienfeld wrote:
Subject: Re: [tips] Re: if hallucinations are not data.
Hi Mike: Two points of friendly dissent.
Hi Scott, no problem.
(1) First, I don't really know what you mean when you say that self-report
tends to be unreliable.
Sorry
Title: Re: [tips] Second-hand smoke and
health
At 10:50 AM -0400 6/28/06, Stephen Black wrote:
Anyway, I checked PubMed, and there's
surprisingly little there. If second-hand smoke does
cause health hazards, there should be a correlation between exposure
and health problems
(as a necessary but
Oops, uh, we didn't mean it. Sorry...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060628/pl_nm/arms_usa_gays_dc_1;_ylt=AnoRaKOXsiHK1wXFTWciC0BsbEwB;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
--
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada
416-736-5115 ex. 66164
[EMAIL
I found the CRS (Congressional Research Service) report on ETS (Evironmental
Tobacco Smoke) to be worth a complete reading.
It can be found at:
http://www.forces.org/evidence/files/crs11-95.htm
They concluded that the science is very definitely not conclusive, and it
appears that the studies
At 4:22 PM -0400 6/28/06, William Scott wrote:
I found the CRS (Congressional Research Service) report on ETS
(Evironmental Tobacco Smoke) to be worth a complete reading.
It can be found at:
http://www.forces.org/evidence/files/crs11-95.htm
They concluded that the science is very definitely
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Paul Brandon went:
Searching on passive smoking dose response came up with:
Respir Res. 2005 Feb 8;6(1):13.
Extent of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and its
dose-response relation to respiratory health among adults.
Good find. And for a potentially
I would like to clarify my earlier post.
I did not equate science with religion.
Nor did I intend to imply anything about how I make my personal choices. People
who put their faith in God as the best way to answer questions and solve
problems often make choices that would be disapproved by
Do you really value science out of faith? Or, do you value science because you
see that it advances knowledge? If it stopped doing that, I bet that you no
longer value it. If that's true, you're belief in science is not based on
faith.
Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/28/health/28smoke.html?ex=115164en=0bee890d281bb3b3ei=5070
Hope you can access this article from the New York Times as it supports
the problems with second hand smoke, just FYI.
Joan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 4:22 PM -0400 6/28/06, William Scott wrote:
I found
18 matches
Mail list logo
