[tips] When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Mike Palij
can they ever get it right? See the article/review below. Outside of the immediately obvious hindsight bias (aka I knew all along bias) what other errors of commission and ommission are made? Perhaps this would be a good article to give to students after they've read relevant primary

[tips] Re: Freud revisited

2006-07-15 Thread Steven Specht
I was not trying to be huffy... I think the question is ill-conceived. On Jul 13, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Pollak, Edward wrote: was Freud trying to be rational about irrational behavior? What am I missing? If a student asked me that question I'd simply say, yes, that's what he was TRYING to do.

[tips] Re: When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Christopher D. Green
Mike Palij wrote: can they ever get it right? Whatever one's position on conservatism and authoritarianism, the real howler is characterizing Adorno as a neo-Freudian. He was a Frankfurt-school Marxist sociologist. Of course there was some Freudishness in the mix (as there was in a great

[tips] re: When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Mike Palij
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 07:49:53 -0700, Christopher D. Green wrote: Mike Palij wrote: can they ever get it right? Whatever one's position on conservatism and authoritarianism, the real howler is characterizing Adorno as a neo-Freudian. When I read this I was wondering whether it was now worse to

[tips] re: When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Christopher D. Green
Mike Palij wrote: I believe that term that is becoming associated with this approach is swiftboating, for obvious reasons. I wonder how long before some students start adopting this as a writing style to deal with topicsthat they disagree with.

[tips] re: When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Christopher D. Green
Mike Palij wrote: Wasn't Else Frankel-Brunswick supposed to provide the descriptiion of the psychological mechanisms (clearly psychoanalytic) that presumably would explain where authoritarian personality tendencies came from? I'm not familiar with her background but her follow-up in

[tips] re: When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Mike Palij
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:32:26 -0700, Christopher D. Green wrote: Mike Palij wrote: Wasn't Else Frankel-Brunswick supposed to provide the descriptiion of the psychological mechanisms (clearly psychoanalytic) that presumably would explain where authoritarian personality tendencies came from? I'm

[tips] re: When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Rick Froman
So, after all of this disambiguation, does the author's referring to this person as Freudian instead of more broadly psychodynamic still qualify as a howler? Because, I have to say, this really ruined the punchline for me. Rick Dr. Rick Froman Psychology Department Box 3055 John Brown

[tips] re: When Conservatives Describe Psychological Research...

2006-07-15 Thread Christopher D. Green
The discussion shifted from Adorno, who was only as "neo-Freudian" as, say, half of all European intellectuals at the time, to Else Frenkel-Brunswik (a co-author of The Authoritarian Personality) who, according to Mike, may have been somewhat more so (but it certainly doesn't show in her