This year, two of the most enjoyable psychology books I read (both quite
appropriate for undergraduate audiences) are Dave Myer's (2003) delightful
"Intuition: Its Powers and Perils" (Dave is on TIPS, right?) and Thomas Blass's
(2004) terrific (and fascinating) "The Man who Shocked the World," whic
This year, two of the most enjoyable psychology books I read (both quite
appropriate for undergraduate audiences) are Dave Myers'(2003) delightful
"Intuition: Its Powers and Perils" (Dave is on TIPS, right?) and Thomas Blass's
(2004) terrific (and fascinating) "The Man who Shocked the World," which
Oops..oh well, I guess I just ruined Stephen Black's test. I failed this one!
...Scott
Quoting Scott O Lilienfeld PhD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> b (Levant was prez-elect for 2004 and will be prez in 2 weeks; Koocher will
> take
> over in 2006). ...Scott
>
>
>
b (Levant was prez-elect for 2004 and will be prez in 2 weeks; Koocher will take
over in 2006). ...Scott
Quoting Stephen Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a hunch. To prove it, I need data, so I'd like to ask everyone
> to take a one-question test and send me your response. To show I'm
> seri
My understanding is that Rorschach did indeed select cards that seemed to do a
decent job of distinguishing schizophrenic (or perhaps more broadly psychotic)
individuals from non-schizophrenic individuals. So Christopher Green is
correct that at least some of Rorschach stimuli were selected empiri
Chris: Yes, thanks for the correction...Scott
Quoting "Christopher D. Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Scott Lilienfeld wrote:
>
> > A great paper that addresses this question, as well as the question of
> > "types" of causality in psychology and other social sciences
> > (including the Mackie "INU
