Chris Green writes:
> I don't understand what Allen doesn't understand.
> It appears that Freud signed the book as he did to give
> the impression (to the hotel clerk) that his sister-in-law
> was his wife.
I entirely agree with Chris!
While Chris was posting his message, I was composing the mes
I don't understand what Allen doesn't understand. It appears that Freud
signed the book as he did to give the impression (to the hotel clerk)
that his sister-in-law was his wife.
Regards,
Chris Green
Allen Esterson wrote:
On 26 December 2006 Stephen wrote [snip], quoting the Blu
On 26 December 2006 Stephen wrote [snip], quoting the Blumenthal article
in the NY Times:
> "Did he have an affair with his wife's younger sister, Minna Bernays?".
Re-checking, I think it is possible that I erred here! (I'll have to check
this out with my colleagues involved with this material.)
Tollefsrud, Linda wrote:
So . . . if sharing the same room is evidence that they were having sex, can we
also assume that, if they had not shared a room, it would prove that they were
not having an affair?
This is another example of the observation that absence of evidence is
not evidence of
54868
(715) 234-8176
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 10:58 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Re: Naughty Freud
On 26 Dec 2006 at 11:04, Allen Esterson wrote
On 26 Dec 2006 at 11:04, Allen Esterson wrote, concerning the hoo-hah
over the discovery of an entry by Freud in a hotel guest book in 1898:
> On 25 December the letter copied below (below my name) was published in
> the NY Times. Spot the crucial mistake. There is a clue at the end of
> the secon
On 24 December 2006 Stephen Black invited TIPSters to read:
> http://tinyurl.com/y9czm6
>
> Ralph Blumenthal: "Hotel Log Hints at Illicit Desire That Dr. Freud
> Didn't Repress", NY Times Dec 24/06
On 25 December the letter copied below (below my name) was published in
the NY Times. Spot the cru
