RE: tests and measurements text?

2006-03-26 Thread Stuart McKelvie
Dear Wendi, I use Richard Gregorys book. It is comprehensive and well-written. I supplement it with readings from journals and include various student exercises, including writing a critique of a test and participation in a class research project in which we gather data on norms,

RE: tests and measurements

2006-03-26 Thread michael sylvester
As long as you discuss validity you should be in good shape.The problem with texts and measuremeints is that they spend too much on reliability and much on validity-constructive and concurrent.Something can be reliable but not valid;but if something is valid,it will be reliable. Michael

RE: tests and measurements

2006-03-26 Thread Michael Scoles
Whether reliability or validity is more important depends on the purpose of using a measurement. For applied settings, where the measure may be used to make decisions affecting a person's life, validity is very important. In basic research, just measuring something reliably can be most

RE: tests and measurements

2006-03-26 Thread John Kulig
in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: tests and measurements Whether reliability or validity is more important depends on the purpose of using a measurement. For applied settings, where the measure may be used to make decisions affecting a person's life, validity is very important. In basic

Re: tests and measurements text?

2006-03-24 Thread Michael Scoles
Its been a while since I've taught it, but Cohen et al. is a good text. It blends some interesting history in with the dry psychometrics. A good cross-validation/regression to the mean exercise can be obtained by assigning students test scores based on some random process (e.g., rolling a