I agree that Matlin is an excellent text and I know that it is used at lot
at both the lower and upper division. Her book seems to be the most up-to-date
and student friendly of all the ones I've reviewed. Thanks,
Karen
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org
To unsubsc
My recommendation is for Goldstein. I found he does the best job of
breadth, depth and readability.
Reed and Maitlin tend to be a bit thin and, I have to disagree with
Karen, not as up to date.
Gary J. Klatsky, Ph. D.
Director, Human Computer Interaction M.A. Program
Department
I have used Matlin in the past and feel that it is a
good lower level Cognitive text. I currently use
Galotti and am very happy with it but it is probably
more of a Jr level undergrad text. It is a couple
steps up from Matlin.
A lot will depend on how ready your students are.
Philip T. Dunwoody
I also prefer Goldstein to any text I have used before.
mary
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Casteel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 10:09 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject: RE: Textbook recommendations requested
Actually, I started
, also,
but I never liked it.
m
> -Original Message-
> From: Annette Taylor, Ph. D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 10:23 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
> Subject: Re: Textbook recommendations requested
>
> A good lower underg
Title: Re: Textbook recommendations requested
You might also look at Goldstein's text "Cognitive Psychology, Connecting Mind, Research, an Everyday Experience". I find it to be a bit more accessible to 200 level students.
--
Doug Wallen
gt; Subject: Re: Textbook recommendations requested
>
> A good lower undergrad cognitive book is Reed's. I have used
> almost all of the ones around at one time or another, or
> reviewed them, and unfortunately, I find that MOST of them
> really are written to do double duty f
A good lower undergrad cognitive book is Reed's. I have used almost all of the
ones around at one time or another, or reviewed them, and
unfortunately, I find
that MOST of them really are written to do double duty for undergrad and grad.
Annette
Quoting "Pollak, Edward " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I second Ed Pollak's recommendation of the Kalat text for a sophomore
level Biopsych class. Although I also liked Pinel's text when I used it
in the past, I think the modular structure of Kalat's text has gone to
is much more appealing to students than the longer chapter format of
Pinel. My syl
